[PATCH v6 56/60] i386/tdx: Don't treat SYSCALL as unavailable

Xiaoyao Li posted 60 patches 2 weeks, 4 days ago
[PATCH v6 56/60] i386/tdx: Don't treat SYSCALL as unavailable
Posted by Xiaoyao Li 2 weeks, 4 days ago
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 target/i386/kvm/tdx.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
index 9cb099e160e4..05475edf72bd 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
@@ -734,6 +734,13 @@ static int tdx_check_features(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg, CPUState *cs)
 
         requested = env->features[w];
         unavailable = requested & ~actual;
+        /*
+         * Intel enumerates SYSCALL bit as 1 only when processor in 64-bit
+         * mode and before vcpu running it's not in 64-bit mode.
+         */
+        if (w == FEAT_8000_0001_EDX && unavailable & CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL) {
+            unavailable &= ~CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL;
+        }
         mark_unavailable_features(cpu, w, unavailable, unav_prefix);
         if (unavailable) {
             mismatch = true;
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v6 56/60] i386/tdx: Don't treat SYSCALL as unavailable
Posted by Daniel P. Berrangé 2 weeks, 4 days ago
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 01:24:04AM -0500, Xiaoyao Li wrote:

Preferrably explain the rationale for why this is needed in
the commit message.

> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/kvm/tdx.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> index 9cb099e160e4..05475edf72bd 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,13 @@ static int tdx_check_features(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg, CPUState *cs)
>  
>          requested = env->features[w];
>          unavailable = requested & ~actual;
> +        /*
> +         * Intel enumerates SYSCALL bit as 1 only when processor in 64-bit
> +         * mode and before vcpu running it's not in 64-bit mode.
> +         */
> +        if (w == FEAT_8000_0001_EDX && unavailable & CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL) {
> +            unavailable &= ~CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL;
> +        }
>          mark_unavailable_features(cpu, w, unavailable, unav_prefix);
>          if (unavailable) {
>              mismatch = true;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Re: [PATCH v6 56/60] i386/tdx: Don't treat SYSCALL as unavailable
Posted by Paolo Bonzini 2 weeks, 4 days ago
On 11/5/24 07:24, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
>   target/i386/kvm/tdx.c | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> index 9cb099e160e4..05475edf72bd 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,13 @@ static int tdx_check_features(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg, CPUState *cs)
>   
>           requested = env->features[w];
>           unavailable = requested & ~actual;
> +        /*
> +         * Intel enumerates SYSCALL bit as 1 only when processor in 64-bit
> +         * mode and before vcpu running it's not in 64-bit mode.
> +         */
> +        if (w == FEAT_8000_0001_EDX && unavailable & CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL) {
> +            unavailable &= ~CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL;
> +        }
>           mark_unavailable_features(cpu, w, unavailable, unav_prefix);
>           if (unavailable) {
>               mismatch = true;

This seems like a TDX module bug?  It's the kind of thing that I guess 
could be worked around in KVM.

If we do it in QEMU, I'd rather see it as

             actual = cpuid_entry_get_reg(entry, wi->cpuid.reg);
             switch (w) {
             case FEAT_8000_0001_EDX:
                 actual |= CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL;
                 break;
             }
             break;

Paolo