On 11/1/24 17:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In the course of a conversation on IRC with somebody who was using
> the ast27x0 code as a model for a new board, I noticed that the
> code currently defines a local ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ with a different
> value from the constant of the same name that we define in the
> include/hw/arm/bsa.h header. This patchset cleans that up and
> also another minor awkwardness that I spotted in the process.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> Peter Maydell (2):
> hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0: Use bsa.h for PPI definitions
> hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0: Avoid hardcoded '256' in IRQ calculation
>
> hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
Applied to aspeed-next.
Thanks,
C.