This is a preparation for the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
---
 include/hw/resettable.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/hw/resettable.h b/include/hw/resettable.h
index fd862f1e9f..0f25beaf21 100644
--- a/include/hw/resettable.h
+++ b/include/hw/resettable.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ typedef enum ResetType {
     RESET_TYPE_WAKEUP,
     RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_INITIAL,
     RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL,
+    RESET_TYPE_SOFT,
 } ResetType;
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.0

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 22:24, Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a preparation for the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/resettable.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/resettable.h b/include/hw/resettable.h
> index fd862f1e9f..0f25beaf21 100644
> --- a/include/hw/resettable.h
> +++ b/include/hw/resettable.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ typedef enum ResetType {
>      RESET_TYPE_WAKEUP,
>      RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_INITIAL,
>      RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL,
> +    RESET_TYPE_SOFT,
>  } ResetType;

We have in general been avoiding defining a "soft" reset
because it's not clear what the meaning of it should be
or how it applies across devices.

If we want to define a new ResetType then we need
to start with the documentation which says clearly
what the semantics of it should be and when it
will be triggered.

You might prefer to avoid entangling that with this
lan9118 refactoring.

thanks
-- PMM