On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 16:46, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> One of the items raised at the QEMU maintainers meeting at KVM Forum
> 2024 was adoption of SPDX-License-Identifier for licensing of newly
> contributed source files, for which there were no dissenting voices.
>
> Thus, to bring the proposal to the wider community, here is a series
> illustrating a way to put the decision into action by extending
> checkpatch.pl to mandate SPDX-License-Identifier in all new files.
>
> Furthermore, anytime it sees SPDX-License-Identifier in any patch,
> whether a new file or pre-existing, it validates the declared license
> name. If it is not one of the commonly used QEMU licenses (the GPL
> variants, MIT, & a few BSD variants), it will report an error. To
> encourage sticking with GPL-2.0-or-later by default, it will issue
> a warning even if it is one of the common licenses, encouraging
> the contributor to double check their choice. This should reduce
> (usually accidental) license proliferation in QEMU code.
For the record, I am in favour of this because it will
(hopefully) catch some of the typically accidental issues
like "user refers to a non-existent license or a license
that's probably not what they meant like LGPLv2" or
"user forgets to say 'or later' for GPL code" or
"user forgets to put in license comment at all" or
"user uses a license that is GPL-compatible but which
we don't use at all at the moment, with no strong reason
why they couldn't use some license we do already use"
(to list some which have come up this year). These are
trivially easy to fix if we can do it before commit when
the author is still around to clarify, and potentially a
real pain to try to fix after the fact, especially if multiple
people have subsequently contributed to the file. We often do
already catch this kind of mistake in code review, but having
the checkpatch check should reduce the human-error factor.
(Conversely, I don't see much benefit to the project in trying
to retrofit SPDX tags to already existing source files, though
I am not in principle opposed to that.)
thanks
-- PMM