From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

../hw/sd/sdhci.c:846:16: error: ‘res’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

False-positive, because "length" is non-null.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
---
 hw/sd/sdhci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
index 87122e4245..ed01499391 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static void sdhci_do_adma(SDHCIState *s)
     const uint16_t block_size = s->blksize & BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
     const MemTxAttrs attrs = { .memory = true };
     ADMADescr dscr = {};
-    MemTxResult res;
+    MemTxResult res = MEMTX_ERROR;
     int i;
 
     if (s->trnmod & SDHC_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN && !s->blkcnt) {
-- 
2.45.2.827.g557ae147e6

marcandre.lureau@redhat.com writes:

> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>
> ../hw/sd/sdhci.c:846:16: error: ‘res’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> False-positive, because "length" is non-null.

I certainly get that:

  length = dscr.length ? dscr.length : 64 * KiB;

means we always have something. Although get_adma_description() is
deserving of a g_assert_not_reached() lest we end up re-using a previous
descr.

I guess wider re-factoring is out of scope for this series though:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro