docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726
the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated
in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does
not gain momentum again.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the
used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides
a password via a file, or encrypted.
+``gluster`` backend (since 9.2)
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726
+the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development
+gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend
+in a future release.
+
+
Character device options
''''''''''''''''''''''''
--
2.46.0
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 15:24 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as > deprecated > in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does > not gain momentum again. As a former Gluster developer/maintainer, this makes sense to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by or equivalent signoff. Cheers, Niels > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on > the command line using the > used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that > provides > a password via a file, or encrypted. > > +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > +According to > https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development > +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster > backend > +in a future release. > + > + > Character device options > '''''''''''''''''''''''' >
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 15:24:51 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated > in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does > not gain momentum again. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the > used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides > a password via a file, or encrypted. > > +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > +According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 > +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development > +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend > +in a future release. Shouldn't also the 'gluster' enum entry of 'BlockdevDriver' (qapi/block-core.json) be marked as deprecated?
On 24/09/2024 16.12, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 15:24:51 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 >> the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated >> in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does >> not gain momentum again. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> >> --- >> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644 >> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst >> @@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the >> used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides >> a password via a file, or encrypted. >> >> +``gluster`` backend (since 9.2) >> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> + >> +According to https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726 >> +the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development >> +gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend >> +in a future release. > > Shouldn't also the 'gluster' enum entry of 'BlockdevDriver' > (qapi/block-core.json) be marked as deprecated? Thanks, that's a good idea! I'll send a v2... Thomas
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.