[PATCH] target/ppc: Fix inequality check in do_lstxv_X

Harsh Prateek Bora posted 1 patch 2 months, 1 week ago
target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] target/ppc: Fix inequality check in do_lstxv_X
Posted by Harsh Prateek Bora 2 months, 1 week ago
This fix was earlier introduced for do_lstxv_D form with 2cc0e449d173
however got missed for _X form. This patch fixes the same.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Suggested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Fixes: 70426b5bb738 ("target/ppc: moved stxvx and lxvx from legacy to decodtree")
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
index 40a87ddc4a..a869f30e86 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
@@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv_PLS_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_PLS_D *a,
 
 static bool do_lstxv_X(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool store, bool paired)
 {
-    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
+    if (paired || a->rt < 32) {
         REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
     } else {
         REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix inequality check in do_lstxv_X
Posted by Fabiano Rosas 2 months, 1 week ago
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> This fix was earlier introduced for do_lstxv_D form with 2cc0e449d173
> however got missed for _X form. This patch fixes the same.
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Suggested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> Fixes: 70426b5bb738 ("target/ppc: moved stxvx and lxvx from legacy to decodtree")
> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
> index 40a87ddc4a..a869f30e86 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
> @@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv_PLS_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_PLS_D *a,
>  
>  static bool do_lstxv_X(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool store, bool paired)
>  {
> -    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
> +    if (paired || a->rt < 32) {
>          REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
>      } else {
>          REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);

Hi Harsh,

Seems I was quicker than you =)

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911141651.6914-1-farosas@suse.de

I'll give my RB and leave up to the maintainers which patch to take:

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix inequality check in do_lstxv_X
Posted by Harsh Prateek Bora 2 months, 1 week ago
Hi Fabiano,

On 9/13/24 17:02, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> This fix was earlier introduced for do_lstxv_D form with 2cc0e449d173
>> however got missed for _X form. This patch fixes the same.
>>
>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Suggested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> Fixes: 70426b5bb738 ("target/ppc: moved stxvx and lxvx from legacy to decodtree")
>> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
>> index 40a87ddc4a..a869f30e86 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
>> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.c.inc
>> @@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv_PLS_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_PLS_D *a,
>>   
>>   static bool do_lstxv_X(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool store, bool paired)
>>   {
>> -    if (paired || a->rt >= 32) {
>> +    if (paired || a->rt < 32) {
>>           REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
>>       } else {
>>           REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
> 
> Hi Harsh,
> 
> Seems I was quicker than you =)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911141651.6914-1-farosas@suse.de
> 
> I'll give my RB and leave up to the maintainers which patch to take:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>

Thanks, I missed looking at your patch earlier.
I would vote for your patch though.

regards,
Harsh