[PATCH v3 06/20] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp

Deepak Gupta posted 20 patches 3 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 06/20] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp
Posted by Deepak Gupta 3 months, 2 weeks ago
zicfilp protects forward control flow (if enabled) by enforcing all
indirect call and jmp must land on a landing pad instruction `lpad`. If
target of an indirect call or jmp is not `lpad` then cpu/hart must raise
a sw check exception with tval = 2.

This patch implements the mechanism using TCG. Target architecture branch
instruction must define the end of a TB. Using this property, during
translation of branch instruction, TB flag = FCFI_LP_EXPECTED can be set.
Translation of target TB can check if FCFI_LP_EXPECTED flag is set and a
flag (fcfi_lp_expected) can be set in DisasContext. If `lpad` gets
translated, fcfi_lp_expected flag in DisasContext can be cleared. Else
it'll fault.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Co-developed-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
Co-developed-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h        |  3 +++
 target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   |  7 ++++++
 target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 13 +++++++++++
 target/riscv/helper.h     |  3 +++
 target/riscv/op_helper.c  |  7 ++++++
 target/riscv/translate.c  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 12334f9540..b77481428f 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -606,6 +606,9 @@ FIELD(TB_FLAGS, ITRIGGER, 22, 1)
 FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VIRT_ENABLED, 23, 1)
 FIELD(TB_FLAGS, PRIV, 24, 2)
 FIELD(TB_FLAGS, AXL, 26, 2)
+/* zicfilp needs a TB flag to track indirect branches */
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, FCFI_ENABLED, 28, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED, 29, 1)
 
 #ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
 #define riscv_cpu_mxl(env)  ((void)(env), MXL_RV32)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
index 127f2179dc..1709564b32 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
@@ -590,6 +590,10 @@ typedef enum {
     LP_EXPECTED = 1,
 } cfi_elp;
 
+typedef enum {
+    MISSING_LPAD = 0,
+} cfi_violation_cause;
+
 /* hstatus CSR bits */
 #define HSTATUS_VSBE         0x00000020
 #define HSTATUS_GVA          0x00000040
@@ -691,6 +695,9 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
     RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x3f,
 } RISCVException;
 
+/* zicfilp defines lp violation results in sw check with tval = 2*/
+#define RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL      2
+
 #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG                0x80000000
 #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_MASK                0x7fffffff
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index 364f3ee212..c7af430f38 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, vaddr *pc,
         flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, VILL, 1);
     }
 
+    if (cpu_get_fcfien(env)) {
+        /*
+         * For Forward CFI, only the expectation of a lpcll at
+         * the start of the block is tracked (which can only happen
+         * when FCFI is enabled for the current processor mode). A jump
+         * or call at the end of the previous TB will have updated
+         * env->elp to indicate the expectation.
+         */
+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED,
+                           env->elp != NO_LP_EXPECTED);
+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_ENABLED, 1);
+    }
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
     fs = EXT_STATUS_DIRTY;
     vs = EXT_STATUS_DIRTY;
diff --git a/target/riscv/helper.h b/target/riscv/helper.h
index 451261ce5a..fc4c41db5e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/helper.h
+++ b/target/riscv/helper.h
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ DEF_HELPER_2(cbo_clean_flush, void, env, tl)
 DEF_HELPER_2(cbo_inval, void, env, tl)
 DEF_HELPER_2(cbo_zero, void, env, tl)
 
+/* helper for raising sw check exception */
+DEF_HELPER_4(raise_sw_check_excep, void, env, tl, tl, tl)
+
 /* Special functions */
 DEF_HELPER_2(csrr, tl, env, int)
 DEF_HELPER_3(csrw, void, env, int, tl)
diff --git a/target/riscv/op_helper.c b/target/riscv/op_helper.c
index 488116cc2e..3b47fb34ea 100644
--- a/target/riscv/op_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/op_helper.c
@@ -259,6 +259,13 @@ void helper_cbo_inval(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong address)
     /* We don't emulate the cache-hierarchy, so we're done. */
 }
 
+void helper_raise_sw_check_excep(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong swcheck_code,
+                                 target_ulong arg1, target_ulong arg2)
+{
+    env->sw_check_code = swcheck_code;
+    riscv_raise_exception(env, RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK, GETPC());
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 
 target_ulong helper_sret(CPURISCVState *env)
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index acba90f170..fbca3b8a06 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static TCGv load_val;
 /* globals for PM CSRs */
 static TCGv pm_mask;
 static TCGv pm_base;
+static TCGOp *cfi_lp_check;
 
 /*
  * If an operation is being performed on less than TARGET_LONG_BITS,
@@ -116,6 +117,9 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
     bool frm_valid;
     bool insn_start_updated;
     const GPtrArray *decoders;
+    /* zicfilp extension. fcfi_enabled, lp expected or not */
+    bool fcfi_enabled;
+    bool fcfi_lp_expected;
 } DisasContext;
 
 static inline bool has_ext(DisasContext *ctx, uint32_t ext)
@@ -1238,6 +1242,8 @@ static void riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
     ctx->pm_base_enabled = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, PM_BASE_ENABLED);
     ctx->ztso = cpu->cfg.ext_ztso;
     ctx->itrigger = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, ITRIGGER);
+    ctx->fcfi_lp_expected = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED);
+    ctx->fcfi_enabled = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_ENABLED);
     ctx->zero = tcg_constant_tl(0);
     ctx->virt_inst_excp = false;
     ctx->decoders = cpu->decoders;
@@ -1245,6 +1251,37 @@ static void riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
 
 static void riscv_tr_tb_start(DisasContextBase *db, CPUState *cpu)
 {
+    DisasContext *ctx = container_of(db, DisasContext, base);
+
+    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
+        /*
+         * Since we can't look ahead to confirm that the first
+         * instruction is a legal landing pad instruction, emit
+         * compare-and-branch sequence that will be fixed-up in
+         * riscv_tr_tb_stop() to either statically hit or skip an
+         * illegal instruction exception depending on whether the
+         * flag was lowered by translation of a CJLP or JLP as
+         * the first instruction in the block.
+         */
+        TCGv_i32 immediate;
+        TCGLabel *l;
+        l = gen_new_label();
+        immediate = tcg_temp_new_i32();
+        tcg_gen_movi_i32(immediate, 0);
+        cfi_lp_check = tcg_last_op();
+        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, immediate, 0, l);
+        gen_helper_raise_sw_check_excep(tcg_env,
+            tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL),
+            tcg_constant_tl(MISSING_LPAD), tcg_constant_tl(0));
+        gen_set_label(l);
+        /*
+         * Despite the use of gen_exception_illegal(), the rest of
+         * the TB needs to be generated. The TCG optimizer will
+         * clean things up depending on which path ends up being
+         * active.
+         */
+        ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NEXT;
+    }
 }
 
 static void riscv_tr_insn_start(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
@@ -1303,6 +1340,14 @@ static void riscv_tr_tb_stop(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
     default:
         g_assert_not_reached();
     }
+
+    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
+        /*
+         * If the "lp expected" flag is still up, the block needs to take an
+         * illegal instruction exception.
+         */
+        tcg_set_insn_param(cfi_lp_check, 1, tcgv_i32_arg(tcg_constant_i32(1)));
+    }
 }
 
 static const TranslatorOps riscv_tr_ops = {
-- 
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH v3 06/20] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp
Posted by Richard Henderson 3 months, 2 weeks ago
On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index 364f3ee212..c7af430f38 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, vaddr *pc,
>           flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, VILL, 1);
>       }
>   
> +    if (cpu_get_fcfien(env)) {
> +        /*
> +         * For Forward CFI, only the expectation of a lpcll at
> +         * the start of the block is tracked (which can only happen
> +         * when FCFI is enabled for the current processor mode). A jump
> +         * or call at the end of the previous TB will have updated
> +         * env->elp to indicate the expectation.
> +         */
> +        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED,
> +                           env->elp != NO_LP_EXPECTED);

A good example why it's better to store this as bool in the first place.

>   static void riscv_tr_tb_start(DisasContextBase *db, CPUState *cpu)
>   {
> +    DisasContext *ctx = container_of(db, DisasContext, base);
> +
> +    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
> +        /*
> +         * Since we can't look ahead to confirm that the first
> +         * instruction is a legal landing pad instruction, emit
> +         * compare-and-branch sequence that will be fixed-up in
> +         * riscv_tr_tb_stop() to either statically hit or skip an
> +         * illegal instruction exception depending on whether the
> +         * flag was lowered by translation of a CJLP or JLP as
> +         * the first instruction in the block.
> +         */
> +        TCGv_i32 immediate;
> +        TCGLabel *l;
> +        l = gen_new_label();
> +        immediate = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +        tcg_gen_movi_i32(immediate, 0);
> +        cfi_lp_check = tcg_last_op();
> +        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, immediate, 0, l);
> +        gen_helper_raise_sw_check_excep(tcg_env,
> +            tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL),
> +            tcg_constant_tl(MISSING_LPAD), tcg_constant_tl(0));
> +        gen_set_label(l);
> +        /*
> +         * Despite the use of gen_exception_illegal(), the rest of
> +         * the TB needs to be generated. The TCG optimizer will
> +         * clean things up depending on which path ends up being
> +         * active.
> +         */
> +        ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NEXT;
> +    }
>   }

Again, don't do this here.
There is a reason why only DISAS_NEXT is legal: plugins.
You *must* do this in riscv_tr_translate_insn, like ARM.


r~
Re: [PATCH v3 06/20] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp
Posted by Deepak Gupta 3 months, 2 weeks ago
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:23:00AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>index 364f3ee212..c7af430f38 100644
>>--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>@@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, vaddr *pc,
>>          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, VILL, 1);
>>      }
>>+    if (cpu_get_fcfien(env)) {
>>+        /*
>>+         * For Forward CFI, only the expectation of a lpcll at
>>+         * the start of the block is tracked (which can only happen
>>+         * when FCFI is enabled for the current processor mode). A jump
>>+         * or call at the end of the previous TB will have updated
>>+         * env->elp to indicate the expectation.
>>+         */
>>+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED,
>>+                           env->elp != NO_LP_EXPECTED);
>
>A good example why it's better to store this as bool in the first place.
>
>>  static void riscv_tr_tb_start(DisasContextBase *db, CPUState *cpu)
>>  {
>>+    DisasContext *ctx = container_of(db, DisasContext, base);
>>+
>>+    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
>>+        /*
>>+         * Since we can't look ahead to confirm that the first
>>+         * instruction is a legal landing pad instruction, emit
>>+         * compare-and-branch sequence that will be fixed-up in
>>+         * riscv_tr_tb_stop() to either statically hit or skip an
>>+         * illegal instruction exception depending on whether the
>>+         * flag was lowered by translation of a CJLP or JLP as
>>+         * the first instruction in the block.
>>+         */
>>+        TCGv_i32 immediate;
>>+        TCGLabel *l;
>>+        l = gen_new_label();
>>+        immediate = tcg_temp_new_i32();
>>+        tcg_gen_movi_i32(immediate, 0);
>>+        cfi_lp_check = tcg_last_op();
>>+        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, immediate, 0, l);
>>+        gen_helper_raise_sw_check_excep(tcg_env,
>>+            tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL),
>>+            tcg_constant_tl(MISSING_LPAD), tcg_constant_tl(0));
>>+        gen_set_label(l);
>>+        /*
>>+         * Despite the use of gen_exception_illegal(), the rest of
>>+         * the TB needs to be generated. The TCG optimizer will
>>+         * clean things up depending on which path ends up being
>>+         * active.
>>+         */
>>+        ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NEXT;
>>+    }
>>  }
>
>Again, don't do this here.
>There is a reason why only DISAS_NEXT is legal: plugins.
>You *must* do this in riscv_tr_translate_insn, like ARM.

Sorry missed this. I remember you gave same feedack in last version.

>
>
>r~