zicfilp introduces a new state elp ("expected landing pad") in cpu.
During normal execution, elp is idle (NO_LP_EXPECTED) i.e not expecting
landing pad. On an indirect call, elp moves LP_EXPECTED. When elp is
LP_EXPECTED, only a subsquent landing pad instruction can set state back
to NO_LP_EXPECTED. On reset, elp is set to NO_LP_EXPECTED.

zicfilp is enabled via bit2 in *envcfg CSRs. Enabling control for M-mode
is in mseccfg CSR at bit position 10.

On trap, elp state is saved away in *status.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Co-developed-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
Co-developed-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c      |  3 +++
 target/riscv/cpu.h      |  2 ++
 target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 target/riscv/csr.c      | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/riscv/pmp.c      |  5 +++++
 target/riscv/pmp.h      |  3 ++-
 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 5dfb3f39ab..82fa85a8d6 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -994,6 +994,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_reset_hold(Object *obj, ResetType type)
     /* mmte is supposed to have pm.current hardwired to 1 */
     env->mmte |= (EXT_STATUS_INITIAL | MMTE_M_PM_CURRENT);
 
+    /* on reset elp is set to NO_LP_EXPECTED */
+    env->elp = NO_LP_EXPECTED;
+
     /*
      * Bits 10, 6, 2 and 12 of mideleg are read only 1 when the Hypervisor
      * extension is enabled.
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 87742047ce..ae436a3179 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ struct CPUArchState {
 
     target_ulong jvt;
 
+    /* elp state for zicfilp extension */
+    cfi_elp      elp;
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
     uint32_t elf_flags;
 #endif
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
index c257c5ed7d..127f2179dc 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
@@ -545,6 +545,8 @@
 #define MSTATUS_TVM         0x00100000 /* since: priv-1.10 */
 #define MSTATUS_TW          0x00200000 /* since: priv-1.10 */
 #define MSTATUS_TSR         0x00400000 /* since: priv-1.10 */
+#define MSTATUS_SPELP       0x00800000 /* zicfilp */
+#define MSTATUS_MPELP       0x020000000000 /* zicfilp */
 #define MSTATUS_GVA         0x4000000000ULL
 #define MSTATUS_MPV         0x8000000000ULL
 
@@ -575,12 +577,19 @@ typedef enum {
 #define SSTATUS_XS          0x00018000
 #define SSTATUS_SUM         0x00040000 /* since: priv-1.10 */
 #define SSTATUS_MXR         0x00080000
+#define SSTATUS_SPELP       MSTATUS_SPELP   /* zicfilp */
 
 #define SSTATUS64_UXL       0x0000000300000000ULL
 
 #define SSTATUS32_SD        0x80000000
 #define SSTATUS64_SD        0x8000000000000000ULL
 
+/* enum for branch tracking state in cpu/hart */
+typedef enum {
+    NO_LP_EXPECTED = 0,
+    LP_EXPECTED = 1,
+} cfi_elp;
+
 /* hstatus CSR bits */
 #define HSTATUS_VSBE         0x00000020
 #define HSTATUS_GVA          0x00000040
@@ -747,6 +756,7 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
 
 /* Execution environment configuration bits */
 #define MENVCFG_FIOM                       BIT(0)
+#define MENVCFG_LPE                        BIT(2) /* zicfilp */
 #define MENVCFG_CBIE                       (3UL << 4)
 #define MENVCFG_CBCFE                      BIT(6)
 #define MENVCFG_CBZE                       BIT(7)
@@ -760,11 +770,13 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
 #define MENVCFGH_STCE                      BIT(31)
 
 #define SENVCFG_FIOM                       MENVCFG_FIOM
+#define SENVCFG_LPE                        MENVCFG_LPE
 #define SENVCFG_CBIE                       MENVCFG_CBIE
 #define SENVCFG_CBCFE                      MENVCFG_CBCFE
 #define SENVCFG_CBZE                       MENVCFG_CBZE
 
 #define HENVCFG_FIOM                       MENVCFG_FIOM
+#define HENVCFG_LPE                        MENVCFG_LPE
 #define HENVCFG_CBIE                       MENVCFG_CBIE
 #define HENVCFG_CBCFE                      MENVCFG_CBCFE
 #define HENVCFG_CBZE                       MENVCFG_CBZE
diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
index 432c59dc66..5771a14848 100644
--- a/target/riscv/csr.c
+++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
@@ -1400,6 +1400,11 @@ static RISCVException write_mstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
         }
     }
 
+    /* If cfi lp extension is available, then apply cfi lp mask */
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        mask |= (MSTATUS_MPELP | MSTATUS_SPELP);
+    }
+
     mstatus = (mstatus & ~mask) | (val & mask);
 
     env->mstatus = mstatus;
@@ -2101,6 +2106,10 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
         mask |= (cfg->ext_svpbmt ? MENVCFG_PBMTE : 0) |
                 (cfg->ext_sstc ? MENVCFG_STCE : 0) |
                 (cfg->ext_svadu ? MENVCFG_ADUE : 0);
+
+        if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+            mask |= MENVCFG_LPE;
+        }
     }
     env->menvcfg = (env->menvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);
 
@@ -2153,6 +2162,10 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
         return ret;
     }
 
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        mask |= SENVCFG_LPE;
+    }
+
     env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
@@ -2190,6 +2203,10 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
 
     if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) {
         mask |= env->menvcfg & (HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE | HENVCFG_ADUE);
+
+        if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+            mask |= HENVCFG_LPE;
+        }
     }
 
     env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);
@@ -2654,6 +2671,10 @@ static RISCVException read_sstatus_i128(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
         mask |= SSTATUS64_UXL;
     }
 
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        mask |= SSTATUS_SPELP;
+    }
+
     *val = int128_make128(sstatus, add_status_sd(MXL_RV128, sstatus));
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
@@ -2665,6 +2686,11 @@ static RISCVException read_sstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
     if (env->xl != MXL_RV32 || env->debugger) {
         mask |= SSTATUS64_UXL;
     }
+
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        mask |= SSTATUS_SPELP;
+    }
+
     /* TODO: Use SXL not MXL. */
     *val = add_status_sd(riscv_cpu_mxl(env), env->mstatus & mask);
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
@@ -2680,6 +2706,11 @@ static RISCVException write_sstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
             mask |= SSTATUS64_UXL;
         }
     }
+
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        mask |= SSTATUS_SPELP;
+    }
+
     target_ulong newval = (env->mstatus & ~mask) | (val & mask);
     return write_mstatus(env, CSR_MSTATUS, newval);
 }
diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.c b/target/riscv/pmp.c
index 9eea397e72..1111d08d08 100644
--- a/target/riscv/pmp.c
+++ b/target/riscv/pmp.c
@@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void mseccfg_csr_write(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong val)
         val &= ~(MSECCFG_MMWP | MSECCFG_MML | MSECCFG_RLB);
     }
 
+    /* M-mode forward cfi to be enabled if cfi extension is implemented */
+    if (env_archcpu(env)->cfg.ext_zicfilp) {
+        val |= (val & MSECCFG_MLPE);
+    }
+
     env->mseccfg = val;
 }
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.h b/target/riscv/pmp.h
index f5c10ce85c..e0530a17a3 100644
--- a/target/riscv/pmp.h
+++ b/target/riscv/pmp.h
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ typedef enum {
     MSECCFG_MMWP  = 1 << 1,
     MSECCFG_RLB   = 1 << 2,
     MSECCFG_USEED = 1 << 8,
-    MSECCFG_SSEED = 1 << 9
+    MSECCFG_SSEED = 1 << 9,
+    MSECCFG_MLPE =  1 << 10,
 } mseccfg_field_t;
 
 typedef struct {
-- 
2.44.0

On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> +/* enum for branch tracking state in cpu/hart */
> +typedef enum {
> +    NO_LP_EXPECTED = 0,
> +    LP_EXPECTED = 1,
> +} cfi_elp;

I know this is language is in the spec, but would it make more sense to use

   bool elp_expected;

?

If not, Coding Style requires CamelCase for typedefs.


r~

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>+/* enum for branch tracking state in cpu/hart */
>>+typedef enum {
>>+    NO_LP_EXPECTED = 0,
>>+    LP_EXPECTED = 1,
>>+} cfi_elp;
>
>I know this is language is in the spec, but would it make more sense to use
>
>  bool elp_expected;
>
>?

Sounds reasonable to me. Will take the suggestion.

>
>If not, Coding Style requires CamelCase for typedefs.
>
>
>r~