On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 01:36:34PM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>RISC-V CFI use new processor-specific dynamic entry in ELF. Permit it in
>>VDSO post-processing script.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
>>---
>> linux-user/gen-vdso-elfn.c.inc | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/linux-user/gen-vdso-elfn.c.inc b/linux-user/gen-vdso-elfn.c.inc
>>index 95856eb839..59c818eb11 100644
>>--- a/linux-user/gen-vdso-elfn.c.inc
>>+++ b/linux-user/gen-vdso-elfn.c.inc
>>@@ -273,6 +273,13 @@ static void elfN(process)(FILE *outf, void *buf, bool need_bswap)
>> errors++;
>> break;
>>+ case PT_LOPROC + 2:
>>+ /* RISCV_ZICFILP_PLT: for RISC-V zicfilp extension */
>>+ if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_RISCV) {
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+ goto do_default;
>
>Documentation? This symbol does not appear in either llvm or binutils
>sources. I presume this is on a development branch somewhere.
>
>The comment is poor. Notice:
Noted. will do better.
>
>> case PT_LOPROC + 3:
>> if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_PPC64) {
>> break; /* DT_PPC64_OPT: integer bitmask */
>
>the ppc64 comment describes the data payload.
>As do the other comments beforehand.
>
>
>r~