[PATCH 2/7] ppc/pnv: Fix LPC POWER8 register sanity check

Nicholas Piggin posted 7 patches 1 year, 6 months ago
Maintainers: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, "Frédéric Barrat" <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>, Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
[PATCH 2/7] ppc/pnv: Fix LPC POWER8 register sanity check
Posted by Nicholas Piggin 1 year, 6 months ago
POWER8 does not have the ISA IRQ -> SERIRQ routing system of later
CPUs, instead all ISA IRQs are sent to the CPU via a single PSI
interrupt. There is a sanity check in the POWER8 case to ensure the
routing bits have not been set, because that would indicate a
programming error.

Those bits were incorrectly specified because of ppc bit numbering
fun. Coverity detected this as an always-zero expression.

Reported-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Resolves: Coverity CID 1558829 (partially)
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
index 80b79dfbbc..8c203d2059 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
@@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static void pnv_lpc_eval_serirq_routes(PnvLpcController *lpc)
     int irq;
 
     if (!lpc->psi_has_serirq) {
-        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK(8, 13)) ||
-            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK(4, 31))) {
+        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK32(8, 13)) ||
+            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK32(4, 31))) {
             qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
                 "OPB: setting serirq routing on POWER8 system, ignoring.\n");
         }
-- 
2.45.2


Re: [PATCH 2/7] ppc/pnv: Fix LPC POWER8 register sanity check
Posted by Cédric Le Goater 1 year, 5 months ago
On 8/6/24 15:13, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> POWER8 does not have the ISA IRQ -> SERIRQ routing system of later
> CPUs, instead all ISA IRQs are sent to the CPU via a single PSI
> interrupt. There is a sanity check in the POWER8 case to ensure the
> routing bits have not been set, because that would indicate a
> programming error.
> 
> Those bits were incorrectly specified because of ppc bit numbering
> fun. Coverity detected this as an always-zero expression.
> 
> Reported-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
> Resolves: Coverity CID 1558829 (partially)
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


> ---
>   hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
> index 80b79dfbbc..8c203d2059 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
> @@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static void pnv_lpc_eval_serirq_routes(PnvLpcController *lpc)
>       int irq;
>   
>       if (!lpc->psi_has_serirq) {
> -        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK(8, 13)) ||
> -            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK(4, 31))) {
> +        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK32(8, 13)) ||
> +            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK32(4, 31))) {
>               qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>                   "OPB: setting serirq routing on POWER8 system, ignoring.\n");
>           }