system/physmem.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno().
It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require().
As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case,
use it as errno for error_setg_errno().
Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard")
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
---
system/physmem.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
index 2154432cb6..9a3b3a7636 100644
--- a/system/physmem.c
+++ b/system/physmem.c
@@ -1845,11 +1845,14 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
}
if (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) {
+ int ret;
+
assert(kvm_enabled());
assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0);
- if (ram_block_discard_require(true) < 0) {
- error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
+ ret = ram_block_discard_require(true);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
"cannot set up private guest memory: discard currently blocked");
error_append_hint(errp, "Are you using assigned devices?\n");
goto out_free;
--
2.34.1
On 16.07.24 08:42, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno(). > It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require(). > > As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case, > use it as errno for error_setg_errno(). > > Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard") > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> > --- > system/physmem.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c > index 2154432cb6..9a3b3a7636 100644 > --- a/system/physmem.c > +++ b/system/physmem.c > @@ -1845,11 +1845,14 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp) > } > > if (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) { > + int ret; > + > assert(kvm_enabled()); > assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0); > > - if (ram_block_discard_require(true) < 0) { > - error_setg_errno(errp, errno, > + ret = ram_block_discard_require(true); > + if (ret < 0) { > + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, > "cannot set up private guest memory: discard currently blocked"); > error_append_hint(errp, "Are you using assigned devices?\n"); > goto out_free; Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
On 16/7/24 08:42, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno(). > It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require(). > > As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case, > use it as errno for error_setg_errno(). > > Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard") > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> > --- > system/physmem.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> and queued, thanks.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.