system/physmem.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno().
It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require().
As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case,
use it as errno for error_setg_errno().
Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard")
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
---
system/physmem.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
index 2154432cb6..9a3b3a7636 100644
--- a/system/physmem.c
+++ b/system/physmem.c
@@ -1845,11 +1845,14 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
}
if (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) {
+ int ret;
+
assert(kvm_enabled());
assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0);
- if (ram_block_discard_require(true) < 0) {
- error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
+ ret = ram_block_discard_require(true);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
"cannot set up private guest memory: discard currently blocked");
error_append_hint(errp, "Are you using assigned devices?\n");
goto out_free;
--
2.34.1
On 16.07.24 08:42, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno().
> It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require().
>
> As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case,
> use it as errno for error_setg_errno().
>
> Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard")
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
> system/physmem.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
> index 2154432cb6..9a3b3a7636 100644
> --- a/system/physmem.c
> +++ b/system/physmem.c
> @@ -1845,11 +1845,14 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
> }
>
> if (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) {
> + int ret;
> +
> assert(kvm_enabled());
> assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0);
>
> - if (ram_block_discard_require(true) < 0) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> + ret = ram_block_discard_require(true);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> "cannot set up private guest memory: discard currently blocked");
> error_append_hint(errp, "Are you using assigned devices?\n");
> goto out_free;
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
On 16/7/24 08:42, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> When ram_block_discard_require() fails, errno is passed to error_setg_errno().
> It's a stale value or 0 which is unrelated to ram_block_discard_require().
>
> As ram_block_discard_require() already returns -EBUSY in failure case,
> use it as errno for error_setg_errno().
>
> Fixes: 852f0048f3ea ("make guest_memfd require uncoordinated discard")
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
> system/physmem.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
and queued, thanks.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.