[PATCH 3/8] aspeed/scu: Add boot-from-eMMC HW strapping bit for AST2600 SoC

Cédric Le Goater posted 8 patches 4 months, 3 weeks ago
Maintainers: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Steven Lee <steven_lee@aspeedtech.com>, Troy Lee <leetroy@gmail.com>, Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 3/8] aspeed/scu: Add boot-from-eMMC HW strapping bit for AST2600 SoC
Posted by Cédric Le Goater 4 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

Bit SCU500[2] of the AST2600 controls the boot device of the SoC.

Future changes will configure this bit to boot from eMMC disk images
specially built for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
 include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
index 58db28db45aa..c9f98c20ffd9 100644
--- a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
+++ b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
@@ -349,6 +349,10 @@ uint32_t aspeed_scu_get_apb_freq(AspeedSCUState *s);
 #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_BYPASS_EN                        (0x1 << 24)
 #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_OFF                              (0x1 << 23)
 
+/* STRAP1 SCU500 */
+#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_EMMC            (0x1 << 2)
+#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_SPI             (0x0 << 2)
+
 /*
  * SCU310   Clock Selection Register Set 4 (for Aspeed AST1030 SOC)
  *
-- 
2.45.2


Re: [PATCH 3/8] aspeed/scu: Add boot-from-eMMC HW strapping bit for AST2600 SoC
Posted by Andrew Jeffery 4 months, 3 weeks ago
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 07:36 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> 
> Bit SCU500[2] of the AST2600 controls the boot device of the SoC.
> 
> Future changes will configure this bit to boot from eMMC disk images
> specially built for this purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> ---
>  include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
> index 58db28db45aa..c9f98c20ffd9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
> @@ -349,6 +349,10 @@ uint32_t aspeed_scu_get_apb_freq(AspeedSCUState *s);
>  #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_BYPASS_EN                        (0x1 << 24)
>  #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_OFF                              (0x1 << 23)
>  
> +/* STRAP1 SCU500 */
> +#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_EMMC            (0x1 << 2)
> +#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_SPI             (0x0 << 2)

Maybe these should have a `SCU_` prefix for consistency?

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
Re: [PATCH 3/8] aspeed/scu: Add boot-from-eMMC HW strapping bit for AST2600 SoC
Posted by Cédric Le Goater 4 months, 3 weeks ago
On 7/5/24 5:36 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 07:36 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>>
>> Bit SCU500[2] of the AST2600 controls the boot device of the SoC.
>>
>> Future changes will configure this bit to boot from eMMC disk images
>> specially built for this purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> ---
>>   include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
>> index 58db28db45aa..c9f98c20ffd9 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.h
>> @@ -349,6 +349,10 @@ uint32_t aspeed_scu_get_apb_freq(AspeedSCUState *s);
>>   #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_BYPASS_EN                        (0x1 << 24)
>>   #define SCU_AST2600_H_PLL_OFF                              (0x1 << 23)
>>   
>> +/* STRAP1 SCU500 */
>> +#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_EMMC            (0x1 << 2)
>> +#define AST2600_HW_STRAP_BOOT_SRC_SPI             (0x0 << 2)
> 
> Maybe these should have a `SCU_` prefix for consistency?

Yep. I agree.  
> Anyway:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
> 


Thanks,

C.