[PATCH 0/2] fix backup-discard-source test for XFS

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy posted 2 patches 5 months, 1 week ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20240620144402.65896-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru
Maintainers: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
.../qemu-iotests/tests/backup-discard-source  | 39 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] fix backup-discard-source test for XFS
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 5 months, 1 week ago
Hi all!

As Kevin reported, the test doesn't work on XFS, as it rely on disk
usage.

Fix it, switching to dirty bitmap for guest write tracking.

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
  iotests/backup-discard-source: convert size variable to be int
  iotests/backup-discard-source: don't use actual-size

 .../qemu-iotests/tests/backup-discard-source  | 39 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix backup-discard-source test for XFS
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Hi Kevin!

Now I revisit my old series, and looking here I see that I forget add you into CC.

Does it still make sense?

On 20.06.24 17:44, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> As Kevin reported, the test doesn't work on XFS, as it rely on disk
> usage.
> 
> Fix it, switching to dirty bitmap for guest write tracking.
> 
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>    iotests/backup-discard-source: convert size variable to be int
>    iotests/backup-discard-source: don't use actual-size
> 
>   .../qemu-iotests/tests/backup-discard-source  | 39 ++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir
Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix backup-discard-source test for XFS
Posted by Kevin Wolf 1 month, 1 week ago
Am 03.10.2024 um 08:39 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> Hi Kevin!
> 
> Now I revisit my old series, and looking here I see that I forget add you into CC.
> 
> Does it still make sense?

Oops, I missed this one indeed.

Thanks, applied to the block branch.

Kevin