On 6/17/24 1:39 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
> On 6/17/24 08:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>>
>> Separate the changes that updates the ranges from the listener, to
> s/updates/update
fixed.
>> make it reusable in preparation to expand its use to vIOMMU support.
>>
>> [ clg: - Rebased on upstream
>> - Introduced vfio_dirty_tracking_update_range() ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/common.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> index d48cd9b9361a92d184e423ffc60aabaff40fb487..fe215918bdf66ddbe3c5db803e10ce1aa9756b90 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> @@ -839,20 +839,11 @@ static bool vfio_section_is_vfio_pci(MemoryRegionSection *section,
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update(MemoryListener *listener,
>> - MemoryRegionSection *section)
>> +static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update_range(VFIODirtyRanges *range,
>> + hwaddr iova, hwaddr end,
>> + bool update_pci)
>> {
>> - VFIODirtyRangesListener *dirty = container_of(listener,
>> - VFIODirtyRangesListener,
>> - listener);
>> - VFIODirtyRanges *range = &dirty->ranges;
>> - hwaddr iova, end, *min, *max;
>> -
>> - if (!vfio_listener_valid_section(section, "tracking_update") ||
>> - !vfio_get_section_iova_range(dirty->bcontainer, section,
>> - &iova, &end, NULL)) {
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + hwaddr *min, *max;
>>
>> /*
>> * The address space passed to the dirty tracker is reduced to three ranges:
>> @@ -873,8 +864,7 @@ static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update(MemoryListener *listener,
>> * The alternative would be an IOVATree but that has a much bigger runtime
>> * overhead and unnecessary complexity.
>> */
>> - if (vfio_section_is_vfio_pci(section, dirty->bcontainer) &&
>> - iova >= UINT32_MAX) {
>> + if (update_pci && iova >= UINT32_MAX) {
>> min = &range->minpci64;
>> max = &range->maxpci64;
>> } else {
>> @@ -889,7 +879,23 @@ static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update(MemoryListener *listener,
>> }
>>
>> trace_vfio_device_dirty_tracking_update(iova, end, *min, *max);
> don't you want to update the name of the trace point?
There is only one caller. Let's reconsider when there are more users of this
routine.
Thanks,
C.
>> - return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update(MemoryListener *listener,
>> + MemoryRegionSection *section)
>> +{
>> + VFIODirtyRangesListener *dirty =
>> + container_of(listener, VFIODirtyRangesListener, listener);
>> + hwaddr iova, end;
>> +
>> + if (!vfio_listener_valid_section(section, "tracking_update") ||
>> + !vfio_get_section_iova_range(dirty->bcontainer, section,
>> + &iova, &end, NULL)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vfio_dirty_tracking_update_range(&dirty->ranges, iova, end,
>> + vfio_section_is_vfio_pci(section, dirty->bcontainer));
>> }
>>
>> static const MemoryListener vfio_dirty_tracking_listener = {
> Besides
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> Eric
>