From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>

SMP_CONFIG_WITH_FULL_TOPO hasn't support module level, so the parameter
should indicate the "clusters".

Additionally, reorder the parameters of -smp to match the topology
hierarchy order.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20240529061925.350323-3-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
index fa8e7d83a7..c9cbc89c21 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
@@ -333,7 +333,9 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_valid[] = {
     }, {
         /*
          * Unsupported parameters are always allowed to be set to '1'
-         * config: -smp 8,books=1,drawers=1,sockets=2,modules=1,dies=1,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=8
+         * config:
+         *   -smp 8,drawers=1,books=1,sockets=2,dies=1,clusters=1,cores=2,\
+         *        threads=2,maxcpus=8
          * expect: cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=8 */
         .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_FULL_TOPO(8, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 8),
         .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
-- 
2.45.2