Hi Oleg,
On 29/5/24 13:36, Oleg Sviridov wrote:
> Pointer, returned from function 's390_ipl_get_iplb_pv', may be NULL and is dereferenced immediately after.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Sviridov <oleg.sviridov@red-soft.ru>
> ---
> hw/s390x/ipl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> index e934bf89d1..2fa6a340a1 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> @@ -706,9 +706,14 @@ int s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header(Error **errp)
> {
> IplParameterBlock *ipib = s390_ipl_get_iplb_pv();
> IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipib->pv;
I suppose ipib_pv being NULL here is a bug elsewhere. You should
add here:
assert(ipib_pv);
and look at the backtrace or audit the code.
> - void *hdr = g_malloc(ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> + void *hdr;
> int rc;
>
> + if (!ipib_pv) {
(If this is a legit error you have to set errp here before returning).
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + hdr = g_malloc(ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> cpu_physical_memory_read(ipib_pv->pv_header_addr, hdr,
> ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
> rc = s390_pv_set_sec_parms((uintptr_t)hdr, ipib_pv->pv_header_len, errp);
> @@ -722,6 +727,10 @@ int s390_ipl_pv_unpack(void)
> IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipib->pv;
> int i, rc = 0;
>
Ditto assert.
> + if (!ipib_pv) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
> rc = s390_pv_unpack(ipib_pv->components[i].addr,
> TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(ipib_pv->components[i].size),