Update the comment to match the X86ConfidentialGuestClass
implementation.

Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
---
 target/i386/confidential-guest.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
index 532e172a60b6..06d54a120227 100644
--- a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
+++ b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct X86ConfidentialGuestClass {
 /**
  * x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type:
  *
- * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.unplug callback of @plug_handler.
+ * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.kvm_type() callback.
  */
 static inline int x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg)
 {
-- 
2.34.1

On 4/26/2024 6:07 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Update the comment to match the X86ConfidentialGuestClass
> implementation.
> 
> Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>

I think it should be "Reported-by"

> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>   target/i386/confidential-guest.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> index 532e172a60b6..06d54a120227 100644
> --- a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> +++ b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct X86ConfidentialGuestClass {
>   /**
>    * x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type:
>    *
> - * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.unplug callback of @plug_handler.
> + * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.kvm_type() callback.
>    */
>   static inline int x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg)
>   {

Hi Xiaoyao,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 07:05:41AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:05:41 +0800
> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] target/i386/confidential-guest: Fix comment of
>  x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type()
> 
> On 4/26/2024 6:07 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > Update the comment to match the X86ConfidentialGuestClass
> > implementation.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> 
> I think it should be "Reported-by"
>

Right, let me fix and respin it.

Thanks,
Zhao

> Update the comment to match the X86ConfidentialGuestClass
> implementation.
> 
> Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>   target/i386/confidential-guest.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> index 532e172a60b6..06d54a120227 100644
> --- a/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> +++ b/target/i386/confidential-guest.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct X86ConfidentialGuestClass {
>   /**
>    * x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type:
>    *
> - * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.unplug callback of @plug_handler.
> + * Calls #X86ConfidentialGuestClass.kvm_type() callback.
>    */
>   static inline int x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type(X86ConfidentialGuest *cg)
>   {

Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>