target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The current semihost exception number (16) is a reserved number (range
[16-17]). The upcoming double trap specification uses that number for
the double trap exception. Since the privileged spec (Table 22) defines
ranges for custom uses change the semihosting exception number to 63
which belongs to the range [48-63] in order to avoid any future
collisions with reserved exception.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
index fc2068ee4d..74318a925c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
@@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT = 0xc, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT = 0xd, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT = 0xf, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
- RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x10,
RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT = 0x14,
RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x15,
RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT = 0x16,
RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x17,
+ RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x3f,
} RISCVException;
#define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG 0x80000000
--
2.43.0
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:59 PM Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > The current semihost exception number (16) is a reserved number (range > [16-17]). The upcoming double trap specification uses that number for > the double trap exception. Since the privileged spec (Table 22) defines > ranges for custom uses change the semihosting exception number to 63 > which belongs to the range [48-63] in order to avoid any future > collisions with reserved exception. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Thanks! Applied to riscv-to-apply.next Alistair > > --- > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > index fc2068ee4d..74318a925c 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > @@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ typedef enum RISCVException { > RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT = 0xc, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT = 0xd, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT = 0xf, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > - RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x10, > RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT = 0x14, > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x15, > RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT = 0x16, > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x17, > + RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x3f, > } RISCVException; > > #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG 0x80000000 > -- > 2.43.0 > >
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:59 PM Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > The current semihost exception number (16) is a reserved number (range > [16-17]). The upcoming double trap specification uses that number for > the double trap exception. Since the privileged spec (Table 22) defines > ranges for custom uses change the semihosting exception number to 63 > which belongs to the range [48-63] in order to avoid any future > collisions with reserved exception. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> Alistair > > --- > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > index fc2068ee4d..74318a925c 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > @@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ typedef enum RISCVException { > RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT = 0xc, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT = 0xd, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT = 0xf, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > - RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x10, > RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT = 0x14, > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x15, > RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT = 0x16, > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x17, > + RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x3f, > } RISCVException; > > #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG 0x80000000 > -- > 2.43.0 > >
Palmer, Anup, On 4/22/24 10:58, Clément Léger wrote: > The current semihost exception number (16) is a reserved number (range > [16-17]). The upcoming double trap specification uses that number for > the double trap exception. Since the privileged spec (Table 22) defines > ranges for custom uses change the semihosting exception number to 63 > which belongs to the range [48-63] in order to avoid any future > collisions with reserved exception. I didn't find any reference to a number for the SEMIHOST exception here: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-semihosting Do we have any potential candidates? I would like to avoid, if possible, setting RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST to 63 as a band-aid just to replace it later on by the real value. Thanks, Daniel > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> > > --- > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > index fc2068ee4d..74318a925c 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > @@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ typedef enum RISCVException { > RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT = 0xc, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT = 0xd, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT = 0xf, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */ > - RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x10, > RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT = 0x14, > RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x15, > RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT = 0x16, > RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x17, > + RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x3f, > } RISCVException; > > #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG 0x80000000
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.