[PATCH v4 0/3] hw/i2c: smbus: Reset fixes

Joe Komlodi posted 3 patches 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20240220211123.2664977-1-komlodi@google.com
Maintainers: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
hw/i2c/core.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
hw/i2c/smbus_slave.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH v4 0/3] hw/i2c: smbus: Reset fixes
Posted by Joe Komlodi 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Changelog:

v3 -> v4

Patch 1
- Removed the rest of the I3CBus class definition that I forgot to
  remove in v3

v2 -> v3
Patch 1
- Removed I3CBus class definition, since it was unneeded.
- whitespace fixes
- Changed enter_reset to hold_reset

Patch 2
- Moved pointer returned by object_get_canonical_path outside of printf
  so it can be freed

Patch 3
- Changed enter_reset to hold_reset

v1 -> v2
- Dropped 4th patch "hw/i2c: smbus: mux: Reset SMBusDevice state
on reset". After more testing and Corey's comment, I realized it
wasn't needed.

Original message:

Hi all,

This series adds some resets for SMBus and for the I2C core. Along with
it, we make SMBus slave error printing a little more helpful.

These reset issues were very infrequent, they would maybe occur in 1 out
of hundreds of resets in our testing, but the way they happen is pretty
straightforward.

Basically as long as a reset happens in the middle of a transaction, the
state of the old transaction would still partially be there after the
reset. Once a new transaction comes in, the partial stale state can
cause the new transaction to incorrectly fail.

Thanks,
Joe

Joe Komlodi (3):
  hw/i2c: core: Add reset
  hw/i2c/smbus_slave: Add object path on error prints
  hw/i2c: smbus_slave: Reset state on reset

 hw/i2c/core.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 hw/i2c/smbus_slave.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] hw/i2c: smbus: Reset fixes
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Joe,

On 20/2/24 22:11, Joe Komlodi wrote:
> Changelog:

> This series adds some resets for SMBus and for the I2C core. Along with
> it, we make SMBus slave error printing a little more helpful.
> 
> These reset issues were very infrequent, they would maybe occur in 1 out
> of hundreds of resets in our testing, but the way they happen is pretty
> straightforward.
> 
> Basically as long as a reset happens in the middle of a transaction, the
> state of the old transaction would still partially be there after the
> reset. Once a new transaction comes in, the partial stale state can
> cause the new transaction to incorrectly fail.

Sorry for jumping late, at v4. I'm a bit confused by this series.

- AFAICT there is no in-band or RESET line with I2C, but
   the AN10216 document mentions:

   I2C Bus recovery

   • Typical case is when masters fails when doing a read
     operation in a slave
   • SDA line is then non usable anymore because of the
     “Slave-Transmitter” mode.
   • Methods to recover the SDA line are:
     – Reset the slave device (assuming the device has a
       Reset pin)
     – Use a bus recovery sequence to leave the “Slave-
       Transmitter” mode
   • Bus recovery sequence is done as following:
     1 - Send 9 clock pulses on SCL line
     2 - Ask the master to keep SDA High until the “Slave-
         Transmitter” releases the SDA line to perform the
         ACK operation
     3 - Keeping SDA High during the ACK means that the
         “Master-Receiver” does not acknowledge the previous
         byte receive
     4 - The “Slave-Transmitter” then goes in an idle state
     5 - The master then sends a STOP command initializing
         completely the bus

- For SMBus Specification Version 2.0:

   3.1.4.2 Power-on reset

   SMBus devices detect a power-on event in one of three ways:
   • By detecting that power is being applied to the device,
   • By an external reset signal that is being asserted or
   • For self-powered or always powered devices, by detecting
     that the SMBus is active (clock and data lines have gone
     high after being low for more than 2 1/2 seconds).

Questions:

- Is the first patch "hw/i2c: core: Add reset" really for
   I2C? Otherwise we could expand smbus form i2cbus, and have
   this reset only for smbus.

- Should we model the "I2C bus recovery sequence" before
   triggering reset?

- Shouldn't we model the smbus 2.5s timeout before triggering
   the reset?

Thanks,

Phil.