[PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé posted 21 patches 8 months, 2 weeks ago
Maintainers: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>, Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>, Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>, Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Chris Wulff <crwulff@gmail.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, "Frédéric Barrat" <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>, Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>, Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
[PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 8 months, 2 weeks ago
Prefer QDev API for QDev objects, avoid the underlying QOM layer.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
index 0c0fb3f1b0..40b7c52f7f 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
@@ -245,8 +245,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
              * spapr_cpu_core_realize(), make sure we only unrealize
              * vCPUs that have already been realized.
              */
-            if (object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(sc->threads[i]), "realized",
-                                         &error_abort)) {
+            if (qdev_is_realized(DEVICE(sc->threads[i]))) {
                 spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[i], sc);
             }
             spapr_delete_vcpu(sc->threads[i]);
-- 
2.41.0


Re: [PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API
Posted by Zhao Liu 8 months, 1 week ago
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:02:54PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:02:54 +0100
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of
>  QOM API
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0
> 
> Prefer QDev API for QDev objects, avoid the underlying QOM layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>

> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 0c0fb3f1b0..40b7c52f7f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -245,8 +245,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
>               * spapr_cpu_core_realize(), make sure we only unrealize
>               * vCPUs that have already been realized.
>               */
> -            if (object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(sc->threads[i]), "realized",
> -                                         &error_abort)) {
> +            if (qdev_is_realized(DEVICE(sc->threads[i]))) {
>                  spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[i], sc);
>              }
>              spapr_delete_vcpu(sc->threads[i]);
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
>