[PATCH 2/2] tests/qtest: Check that EXTI fan-in irqs are correctly connected

Inès Varhol posted 2 patches 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Maintainers: Arnaud Minier <arnaud.minier@telecom-paris.fr>, "Inès Varhol" <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 2/2] tests/qtest: Check that EXTI fan-in irqs are correctly connected
Posted by Inès Varhol 6 months, 4 weeks ago
This commit adds a QTest that verifies each input line of a specific
EXTI OR gate can influence the output line.

Signed-off-by: Inès Varhol <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr>
---
 tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c b/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
index c390077713..276b7adc7a 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@
 
 #define EXTI0_IRQ 6
 #define EXTI1_IRQ 7
+#define EXTI5_IRQ 23
+#define EXTI6_IRQ 23
+#define EXTI7_IRQ 23
+#define EXTI8_IRQ 23
+#define EXTI9_IRQ 23
 #define EXTI35_IRQ 1
 
 static void enable_nvic_irq(unsigned int n)
@@ -499,6 +504,96 @@ static void test_interrupt(void)
     g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI1_IRQ));
 }
 
+static void test_orred_interrupts(void)
+{
+    /*
+     * For lines EXTI5..9 (fanned-in to NVIC irq 23),
+     * test that rising the line pends interrupt
+     * 23 in NVIC.
+     */
+    enable_nvic_irq(EXTI5_IRQ);
+    /* Check that there are no interrupts already pending in PR */
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    /* Check that this specific interrupt isn't pending in NVIC */
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI5_IRQ));
+
+    /* Enable interrupt lines EXTI[5..9] */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_IMR1, (0x1F << 5));
+
+    /* Configure interrupt on rising edge */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_RTSR1, (0x1F << 5));
+
+    /* Simulate rising edge from GPIO line 7 */
+    exti_set_irq(7, 1);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 1 << 7);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI7_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clear the pending bit in PR */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_PR1, 1 << 7);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI7_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clean NVIC */
+    unpend_nvic_irq(EXTI7_IRQ);
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI7_IRQ));
+
+    /* Simulate rising edge from GPIO line 6 */
+    exti_set_irq(6, 1);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 1 << 6);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI6_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clear the pending bit in PR */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_PR1, 1 << 6);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI6_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clean NVIC */
+    unpend_nvic_irq(EXTI6_IRQ);
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI6_IRQ));
+
+    /* Simulate rising edge from GPIO line 5 */
+    exti_set_irq(5, 1);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 1 << 5);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI5_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clear the pending bit in PR */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_PR1, 1 << 5);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI5_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clean NVIC */
+    unpend_nvic_irq(EXTI5_IRQ);
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI5_IRQ));
+
+    /* Simulate rising edge from GPIO line 8 */
+    exti_set_irq(8, 1);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 1 << 8);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI8_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clear the pending bit in PR */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_PR1, 1 << 8);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI8_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clean NVIC */
+    unpend_nvic_irq(EXTI8_IRQ);
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI8_IRQ));
+
+    /* Simulate rising edge from GPIO line 9 */
+    exti_set_irq(9, 1);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 1 << 9);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI9_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clear the pending bit in PR */
+    exti_writel(EXTI_PR1, 1 << 9);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(exti_readl(EXTI_PR1), ==, 0x00000000);
+    g_assert_true(check_nvic_pending(EXTI9_IRQ));
+
+    /* Clean NVIC */
+    unpend_nvic_irq(EXTI9_IRQ);
+    g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI9_IRQ));
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
     int ret;
@@ -515,6 +610,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
     qtest_add_func("stm32l4x5/exti/masked_interrupt", test_masked_interrupt);
     qtest_add_func("stm32l4x5/exti/interrupt", test_interrupt);
     qtest_add_func("stm32l4x5/exti/test_edge_selector", test_edge_selector);
+    qtest_add_func("stm32l4x5/exti/test_orred_interrupts",
+                   test_orred_interrupts);
 
     qtest_start("-machine b-l475e-iot01a");
     ret = g_test_run();
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests/qtest: Check that EXTI fan-in irqs are correctly connected
Posted by Peter Maydell 6 months, 3 weeks ago
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 16:34, Inès Varhol <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr> wrote:
>
> This commit adds a QTest that verifies each input line of a specific
> EXTI OR gate can influence the output line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Inès Varhol <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr>
> ---
>  tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c b/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
> index c390077713..276b7adc7a 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/stm32l4x5_exti-test.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@
>
>  #define EXTI0_IRQ 6
>  #define EXTI1_IRQ 7
> +#define EXTI5_IRQ 23
> +#define EXTI6_IRQ 23
> +#define EXTI7_IRQ 23
> +#define EXTI8_IRQ 23
> +#define EXTI9_IRQ 23
>  #define EXTI35_IRQ 1
>
>  static void enable_nvic_irq(unsigned int n)
> @@ -499,6 +504,96 @@ static void test_interrupt(void)
>      g_assert_false(check_nvic_pending(EXTI1_IRQ));
>  }
>
> +static void test_orred_interrupts(void)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * For lines EXTI5..9 (fanned-in to NVIC irq 23),
> +     * test that rising the line pends interrupt

"raising"

> +     * 23 in NVIC.
> +     */

I feel like you could probably write this code to use a loop
to avoid some of the repetition, but this is only test code,
so it's fine as-is.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM