hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Replace '24' -> KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
index 409d0c8c76..b96fe84eed 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
}
if (pci_enabled) {
- for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; ++i) {
if (i == 0) {
kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
} else if (i != 2) {
--
2.41.0
09.02.2024 22:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
> Replace '24' -> KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS.
Picked up for trivial-patches. Not exactly a trivial thing but heck :)
Thanks,
/mjt
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index 409d0c8c76..b96fe84eed 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
> }
> if (pci_enabled) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; ++i) {
> if (i == 0) {
> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
> } else if (i != 2) {
09.02.2024 22:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
> Replace '24' -> KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index 409d0c8c76..b96fe84eed 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
> }
> if (pci_enabled) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; ++i) {
> if (i == 0) {
> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
> } else if (i != 2) {
There seems to be some confusion here about
KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS vs IOAPIC_NUM_PINS (and
vs ICH9_LPC_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS).
FWIW.
/mjt
On 10/2/24 09:54, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 09.02.2024 22:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
>> Replace '24' -> KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
>> index 409d0c8c76..b96fe84eed 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
>> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
>> }
>> if (pci_enabled) {
>> - for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; ++i) {
>> if (i == 0) {
>> kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
>> } else if (i != 2) {
>
> There seems to be some confusion here about
> KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS vs IOAPIC_NUM_PINS (and
> vs ICH9_LPC_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS).
Well this is what I'm trying to clear, isn't it?
KVM irqchip has a hard limit. ICH9_LPC_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS is
specified in the ICH9 datasheet. It is unclear to me what
IOAPIC_NUM_PINS represents, I suppose it emerged from the
evolution of the Frankenstein PC machine to Q35.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.