[RFC 0/6] Intel Thread Director Virtualization Support in QEMU

Zhao Liu posted 6 patches 9 months, 3 weeks ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20240203093054.412135-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com
Maintainers: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
target/i386/cpu.c     | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
target/i386/cpu.h     |  37 +++++++++++++++
target/i386/kvm/kvm.c |  84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[RFC 0/6] Intel Thread Director Virtualization Support in QEMU
Posted by Zhao Liu 9 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>

Hi list,

This is our refreshed RFC to support our ITD virtualization patch
series [1] in KVM, and bases on bd2e12310b18 ("Merge tag
'qga-pull-2024-01-30' of https://github.com/kostyanf14/qemu into
staging").

ITD is Intel's client specific feature to optimize scheduling on Intel
hybrid platforms. Though this feature depends on hybrid topology
details, in our parctice on Win11 Guest, ITD works with hyrbid topolohy
and CPU affinity can achieve the most performance improvement in Win11
Guest (for example, on i9-13900K, up to 14%+ improvement on
3DMARK). More data or details, can be found in [1]. Thus, the ITD for
Win11 is also a typical use case of hybrid topology.


Welcome your feedback!


1. Background and Motivation
============================

ITD allows the hardware to provide scheduling hints to the OS to help
optimize scheduling performance, and under the Intel hybrid
architecture, since Core and Atom have different capabilities
(performance, energy effency, etc.),  scheduling based on hardware
hints can take full advantage of this hybrid architecture. This is also
the most ideal scheduling model for intel hybrid architecture.

Therefore, we want to virtualize the ITD feature so that ITD can benefit
performance of the virtual machines on the hybrid machines as well.

Currently, our ITD virtualization is a software virtualization solution.


2. Introduction to HFI and ITD
==============================

Intel provides Hardware Feedback Interface (HFI) feature to allow
hardware to provide guidance to the OS scheduler to perform optimal
workload scheduling through a hardware feedback interface structure in
memory [2]. This hfi structure is called HFI table.

As for now, the guidance includes performance and energy enficency hints,
and it could update via thermal interrupt as the actual operating
conditions of the processor change during run time.

And Intel Thread Director (ITD) feature extends the HFI to provide
performance and energy efficiency data for advanced classes of
instructions.

The virtual HFI table is maintained in KVM, and for QEMU, we just need
to handle HFI/ITD/HRESET (and their dependent features: ACPI, TM and
PTS) related CPUIDs and MSRs.


3. Package level MSRs handling
==============================

PTS, HFI and ITD are all have package level features, such as package
level MSRs and package level HFI tables. But since KVM hasn't
support msr-topology and it just handle these package-level MSRs and
HFI table at VM level, in order to avoid potential contention problems
caused by multiple virtual-packages, we restrict VMs to be able to
enable PTC/HFI/ITD iff there's only 1 package (and only 1 die for
ITD/HFI).


4. HFI/ITD related info in CPUID
================================

KVM provides some basic HFI info in CPUID.0x06 leaf, which is associated
with the virtual HFI table in KVM.

QEMU should configure HFI table index for each vCPU. Here we set the HFI
table index to vCPU index so that different vCPUs have different HFI
entries to avoid unnecessary competition problems.


5. Compatibility issues
=======================

HFI is supported in both server (SPR) and client (ADL/RPL/MTL) platform
products while ITD is the client specific feature.

For client platform, ITD (with HFI) could be enabled in Guest to improve
scheduling, but for server platform, HFI (without ITD) is only useful
on Host and Guest doesn't need it.

To simplify the enabling logic and avoid impacting the common topology
of the Guest, we set PTS, HFI, and ITD as feature bits that are not
automatically enabled.

Only when the user actively specifies these features, QEMU will check
and decide whether to enable them based on the topology constraints and
the ITD constraints.


6. New option "enable-itd"
============================

ITD-related features include PTS, HFI, ITD, and HRESET.

To make it easier for users to enable ITD for Guest without specifying
the above feature bits one by one, we provide a new option "enable-itd"
to set the above feature bits for Guest all at once.

"enable-itd" does not guarantee that ITD will be enabled for Guest.
The success of enabling ITD for guest depends on topology constraints,
platform support, etc., which are checked in QEMU.


7. Patch Summary
================

Patch 1: Add support save/load for ACPI feature related thermal MSRs
         since ACPI feature CPUID has been added in QEMU.
Patch 2: Add support for PTS (package) thermal MSRs and its CPUID
Patch 3: Add support for HFI MSRs and its CPUID
Patch 4: Add support ITD CPUID and MSR_IA32_HW_FEEDBACK_THREAD_CONFIG.
Patch 5: Add support HRESET CPUID and MSR_IA32_HW_HRESET_ENABLE.
Patch 6: Add "enable-itd" to help user set ITD related feature bits.

# 8. References

[1]: KVM RFC: [RFC 00/26] Intel Thread Director Virtualization
     https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240203091214.411862-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com/T/#t
[2]: SDM, vol. 3B, section 15.6 HARDWARE FEEDBACK INTERFACE AND INTEL
     THREAD DIRECTOR

Thanks and Best Regards,
Zhao
---
Zhao Liu (2):
  target/i386: Add support for Intel Thread Director feature
  i386: Add a new property to set ITD related feature bits for Guest

Zhuocheng Ding (4):
  target/i386: Add support for save/load of ACPI thermal MSRs
  target/i386: Add support for Package Thermal Management feature
  target/i386: Add support for Hardware Feedback Interface feature
  target/i386: Add support for HRESET feature

 target/i386/cpu.c     | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 target/i386/cpu.h     |  37 +++++++++++++++
 target/i386/kvm/kvm.c |  84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [RFC 0/6] Intel Thread Director Virtualization Support in QEMU
Posted by Zhao Liu 9 months, 3 weeks ago
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 05:30:48PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 17:30:48 +0800
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [RFC 0/6] Intel Thread Director Virtualization Support in QEMU
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
> 
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> This is our refreshed RFC to support our ITD virtualization patch
> series [1] in KVM, and bases on bd2e12310b18 ("Merge tag
> 'qga-pull-2024-01-30' of https://github.com/kostyanf14/qemu into
> staging").
> 
> ITD is Intel's client specific feature to optimize scheduling on Intel
> hybrid platforms. Though this feature depends on hybrid topology

s/depends/doesn't depend/

Regards,
Zhao

> details, in our parctice on Win11 Guest, ITD works with hyrbid topolohy
> and CPU affinity can achieve the most performance improvement in Win11
> Guest (for example, on i9-13900K, up to 14%+ improvement on
> 3DMARK). More data or details, can be found in [1]. Thus, the ITD for
> Win11 is also a typical use case of hybrid topology.
> 
> 
> Welcome your feedback!
> 
> 
> 1. Background and Motivation
> ============================
> 
> ITD allows the hardware to provide scheduling hints to the OS to help
> optimize scheduling performance, and under the Intel hybrid
> architecture, since Core and Atom have different capabilities
> (performance, energy effency, etc.),  scheduling based on hardware
> hints can take full advantage of this hybrid architecture. This is also
> the most ideal scheduling model for intel hybrid architecture.
> 
> Therefore, we want to virtualize the ITD feature so that ITD can benefit
> performance of the virtual machines on the hybrid machines as well.
> 
> Currently, our ITD virtualization is a software virtualization solution.
> 
> 
> 2. Introduction to HFI and ITD
> ==============================
> 
> Intel provides Hardware Feedback Interface (HFI) feature to allow
> hardware to provide guidance to the OS scheduler to perform optimal
> workload scheduling through a hardware feedback interface structure in
> memory [2]. This hfi structure is called HFI table.
> 
> As for now, the guidance includes performance and energy enficency hints,
> and it could update via thermal interrupt as the actual operating
> conditions of the processor change during run time.
> 
> And Intel Thread Director (ITD) feature extends the HFI to provide
> performance and energy efficiency data for advanced classes of
> instructions.
> 
> The virtual HFI table is maintained in KVM, and for QEMU, we just need
> to handle HFI/ITD/HRESET (and their dependent features: ACPI, TM and
> PTS) related CPUIDs and MSRs.
> 
> 
> 3. Package level MSRs handling
> ==============================
> 
> PTS, HFI and ITD are all have package level features, such as package
> level MSRs and package level HFI tables. But since KVM hasn't
> support msr-topology and it just handle these package-level MSRs and
> HFI table at VM level, in order to avoid potential contention problems
> caused by multiple virtual-packages, we restrict VMs to be able to
> enable PTC/HFI/ITD iff there's only 1 package (and only 1 die for
> ITD/HFI).
> 
> 
> 4. HFI/ITD related info in CPUID
> ================================
> 
> KVM provides some basic HFI info in CPUID.0x06 leaf, which is associated
> with the virtual HFI table in KVM.
> 
> QEMU should configure HFI table index for each vCPU. Here we set the HFI
> table index to vCPU index so that different vCPUs have different HFI
> entries to avoid unnecessary competition problems.
> 
> 
> 5. Compatibility issues
> =======================
> 
> HFI is supported in both server (SPR) and client (ADL/RPL/MTL) platform
> products while ITD is the client specific feature.
> 
> For client platform, ITD (with HFI) could be enabled in Guest to improve
> scheduling, but for server platform, HFI (without ITD) is only useful
> on Host and Guest doesn't need it.
> 
> To simplify the enabling logic and avoid impacting the common topology
> of the Guest, we set PTS, HFI, and ITD as feature bits that are not
> automatically enabled.
> 
> Only when the user actively specifies these features, QEMU will check
> and decide whether to enable them based on the topology constraints and
> the ITD constraints.
> 
> 
> 6. New option "enable-itd"
> ============================
> 
> ITD-related features include PTS, HFI, ITD, and HRESET.
> 
> To make it easier for users to enable ITD for Guest without specifying
> the above feature bits one by one, we provide a new option "enable-itd"
> to set the above feature bits for Guest all at once.
> 
> "enable-itd" does not guarantee that ITD will be enabled for Guest.
> The success of enabling ITD for guest depends on topology constraints,
> platform support, etc., which are checked in QEMU.
> 
> 
> 7. Patch Summary
> ================
> 
> Patch 1: Add support save/load for ACPI feature related thermal MSRs
>          since ACPI feature CPUID has been added in QEMU.
> Patch 2: Add support for PTS (package) thermal MSRs and its CPUID
> Patch 3: Add support for HFI MSRs and its CPUID
> Patch 4: Add support ITD CPUID and MSR_IA32_HW_FEEDBACK_THREAD_CONFIG.
> Patch 5: Add support HRESET CPUID and MSR_IA32_HW_HRESET_ENABLE.
> Patch 6: Add "enable-itd" to help user set ITD related feature bits.
> 
> # 8. References
> 
> [1]: KVM RFC: [RFC 00/26] Intel Thread Director Virtualization
>      https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240203091214.411862-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com/T/#t
> [2]: SDM, vol. 3B, section 15.6 HARDWARE FEEDBACK INTERFACE AND INTEL
>      THREAD DIRECTOR
> 
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Zhao
> ---
> Zhao Liu (2):
>   target/i386: Add support for Intel Thread Director feature
>   i386: Add a new property to set ITD related feature bits for Guest
> 
> Zhuocheng Ding (4):
>   target/i386: Add support for save/load of ACPI thermal MSRs
>   target/i386: Add support for Package Thermal Management feature
>   target/i386: Add support for Hardware Feedback Interface feature
>   target/i386: Add support for HRESET feature
> 
>  target/i386/cpu.c     | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  target/i386/cpu.h     |  37 +++++++++++++++
>  target/i386/kvm/kvm.c |  84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>