On 2/15/24 06:52, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:23 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In this new version we changed patch 3 as suggested by Alistair in v1
>> [1]. Instead of creating individual always-true bool for each named
>> feature, create a bool flag will be always 'true' to be used as config
>> offset for these named extensions.
>>
>> Patches based on riscv-to-apply.next.
>>
>> Patches missing acks: patch 3.
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>> - patch 3:
>> - 'ext_always_enabled' bool added
>> - individual always-enabled named features bools removed
>> - v2 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20240126133101.61344-8-ajones@ventanamicro.com/
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20240125195319.329181-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>>
>> Andrew Jones (3):
>> target/riscv: Reset henvcfg to zero
>> target/riscv: Gate hardware A/D PTE bit updating
>> target/riscv: Promote svade to a normal extension
>>
>> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
>> target/riscv/tcg: set 'mmu' with 'satp' in cpu_set_profile()
>> target/riscv: add riscv,isa to named features
>> target/riscv: add remaining named features
>
> Do you mind rebasing? I feel bad always asking, but I think it's your
> patches that cause the conflicts :P
:)
I'll re-send based on current riscv-to-apply.next. Thanks,
Daniel
>
> Alistair
>
>>
>> target/riscv/cpu.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h | 12 +++++--
>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 19 ++++++++---
>> target/riscv/csr.c | 2 +-
>> target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 34 +++++++++---------
>> 5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>