1. Patchew
  2. QEMU
  3. View series

[PATCH v2] virtio-gpu: Correct virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() error check

Dmitry Osipenko posted 1 patch 10 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20240129073921.446869-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com
Maintainers: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c | 6 +++---
hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c  | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2] virtio-gpu: Correct virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() error check
Posted by Dmitry Osipenko 10 months ago 
virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() returns errno and not -1 on error.
Correct the return-value check.

Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
---

v2: - Fixed similar incorrect error-checking in vhost-user-gpu
    - Added r-b from Marc

 contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c | 6 +++---
 hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c b/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
index d1ccdf7d0668..51da0e3667f9 100644
--- a/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
+++ b/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(uint32_t resource_id,
 #ifdef VIRGL_RENDERER_RESOURCE_INFO_EXT_VERSION
     struct virgl_renderer_resource_info_ext info_ext;
     ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info_ext(resource_id, &info_ext);
-    if (ret < 0) {
+    if (ret) {
         return ret;
     }
 
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(uint32_t resource_id,
     *modifiers = info_ext.modifiers;
 #else
     ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info(resource_id, info);
-    if (ret < 0) {
+    if (ret) {
         return ret;
     }
 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ virgl_cmd_set_scanout(VuGpu *g,
         uint64_t modifiers = 0;
         ret = virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(ss.resource_id, &info,
                                                 &modifiers);
-        if (ret == -1) {
+        if (ret) {
             g_critical("%s: illegal resource specified %d\n",
                        __func__, ss.resource_id);
             cmd->error = VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_ERR_INVALID_RESOURCE_ID;
diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
index 8bb7a2c21fe7..9f34d0e6619c 100644
--- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
+++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void virgl_cmd_set_scanout(VirtIOGPU *g,
         memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
         ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info(ss.resource_id, &info);
 #endif
-        if (ret == -1) {
+        if (ret) {
             qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
                           "%s: illegal resource specified %d\n",
                           __func__, ss.resource_id);
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-gpu: Correct virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() error check
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 3 months, 2 weeks ago 
Hi Dmitry,

On 29/1/24 08:39, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() returns errno and not -1 on error.

So basically we were ignoring all errors...

Could some errors just be safely ignored? Because apparently
this patch now gives troubles, see:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2490
Can you help us there?

Regards,

Phil.

> Correct the return-value check.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: - Fixed similar incorrect error-checking in vhost-user-gpu
>      - Added r-b from Marc
> 
>   contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c | 6 +++---
>   hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c  | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c b/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
> index d1ccdf7d0668..51da0e3667f9 100644
> --- a/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
> +++ b/contrib/vhost-user-gpu/virgl.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(uint32_t resource_id,
>   #ifdef VIRGL_RENDERER_RESOURCE_INFO_EXT_VERSION
>       struct virgl_renderer_resource_info_ext info_ext;
>       ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info_ext(resource_id, &info_ext);
> -    if (ret < 0) {
> +    if (ret) {
>           return ret;
>       }
>   
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(uint32_t resource_id,
>       *modifiers = info_ext.modifiers;
>   #else
>       ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info(resource_id, info);
> -    if (ret < 0) {
> +    if (ret) {
>           return ret;
>       }
>   
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ virgl_cmd_set_scanout(VuGpu *g,
>           uint64_t modifiers = 0;
>           ret = virgl_get_resource_info_modifiers(ss.resource_id, &info,
>                                                   &modifiers);
> -        if (ret == -1) {
> +        if (ret) {
>               g_critical("%s: illegal resource specified %d\n",
>                          __func__, ss.resource_id);
>               cmd->error = VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_ERR_INVALID_RESOURCE_ID;
> diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> index 8bb7a2c21fe7..9f34d0e6619c 100644
> --- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> +++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void virgl_cmd_set_scanout(VirtIOGPU *g,
>           memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>           ret = virgl_renderer_resource_get_info(ss.resource_id, &info);
>   #endif
> -        if (ret == -1) {
> +        if (ret) {
>               qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>                             "%s: illegal resource specified %d\n",
>                             __func__, ss.resource_id);
Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-gpu: Correct virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() error check
Posted by Dmitry Osipenko 3 months, 2 weeks ago 
On 8/9/24 12:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 29/1/24 08:39, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> virgl_renderer_resource_get_info() returns errno and not -1 on error.
> 
> So basically we were ignoring all errors...
> 
> Could some errors just be safely ignored? Because apparently
> this patch now gives troubles, see:
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2490
> Can you help us there?

Hi, Philippe. Replied on the gitlab.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.