Make separation of alternative xtensa memory management options state
explicit.
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
---
target/xtensa/cpu.h | 18 +++++++++++++----
target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/xtensa/cpu.h b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
index 8a423706d8c0..497325466397 100644
--- a/target/xtensa/cpu.h
+++ b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
@@ -326,11 +326,21 @@ typedef struct xtensa_tlb {
unsigned nrefillentries;
} xtensa_tlb;
+typedef struct XtensaMMU {
+ xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
+ xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
+ unsigned autorefill_idx;
+} XtensaMMU;
+
typedef struct xtensa_mpu_entry {
uint32_t vaddr;
uint32_t attr;
} xtensa_mpu_entry;
+typedef struct XtensaMPU {
+ xtensa_mpu_entry fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
+} XtensaMPU;
+
typedef struct XtensaGdbReg {
int targno;
unsigned flags;
@@ -526,10 +536,10 @@ struct CPUArchState {
uint32_t exclusive_val;
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
- xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
- xtensa_mpu_entry mpu_fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
- unsigned autorefill_idx;
+ union {
+ XtensaMMU mmu;
+ XtensaMPU mpu;
+ };
bool runstall;
AddressSpace *address_space_er;
MemoryRegion *system_er;
diff --git a/target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c b/target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c
index 2fda4e887cce..d9f845e7fb6f 100644
--- a/target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c
+++ b/target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c
@@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ static xtensa_tlb_entry *xtensa_tlb_get_entry(CPUXtensaState *env, bool dtlb,
assert(wi < tlb->nways && ei < tlb->way_size[wi]);
return dtlb ?
- env->dtlb[wi] + ei :
- env->itlb[wi] + ei;
+ env->mmu.dtlb[wi] + ei :
+ env->mmu.itlb[wi] + ei;
}
static xtensa_tlb_entry *get_tlb_entry(CPUXtensaState *env,
@@ -411,11 +411,11 @@ void reset_mmu(CPUXtensaState *env)
env->sregs[RASID] = 0x04030201;
env->sregs[ITLBCFG] = 0;
env->sregs[DTLBCFG] = 0;
- env->autorefill_idx = 0;
- reset_tlb_mmu_all_ways(env, &env->config->itlb, env->itlb);
- reset_tlb_mmu_all_ways(env, &env->config->dtlb, env->dtlb);
- reset_tlb_mmu_ways56(env, &env->config->itlb, env->itlb);
- reset_tlb_mmu_ways56(env, &env->config->dtlb, env->dtlb);
+ env->mmu.autorefill_idx = 0;
+ reset_tlb_mmu_all_ways(env, &env->config->itlb, env->mmu.itlb);
+ reset_tlb_mmu_all_ways(env, &env->config->dtlb, env->mmu.dtlb);
+ reset_tlb_mmu_ways56(env, &env->config->itlb, env->mmu.itlb);
+ reset_tlb_mmu_ways56(env, &env->config->dtlb, env->mmu.dtlb);
} else if (xtensa_option_enabled(env->config, XTENSA_OPTION_MPU)) {
unsigned i;
@@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ void reset_mmu(CPUXtensaState *env)
}
} else {
env->sregs[CACHEATTR] = 0x22222222;
- reset_tlb_region_way0(env, env->itlb);
- reset_tlb_region_way0(env, env->dtlb);
+ reset_tlb_region_way0(env, env->mmu.itlb);
+ reset_tlb_region_way0(env, env->mmu.dtlb);
}
}
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int xtensa_tlb_lookup(const CPUXtensaState *env,
const xtensa_tlb *tlb = dtlb ?
&env->config->dtlb : &env->config->itlb;
const xtensa_tlb_entry (*entry)[MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE] = dtlb ?
- env->dtlb : env->itlb;
+ env->mmu.dtlb : env->mmu.itlb;
int nhits = 0;
unsigned wi;
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int get_physical_addr_mmu(CPUXtensaState *env, bool update_tlb,
split_tlb_entry_spec_way(env, vaddr, dtlb, &vpn, wi, &ei);
if (update_tlb) {
- wi = ++env->autorefill_idx & 0x3;
+ wi = ++env->mmu.autorefill_idx & 0x3;
xtensa_tlb_set_entry(env, dtlb, wi, ei, vpn, pte);
env->sregs[EXCVADDR] = vaddr;
qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s: autorefill(%08x): %08x -> %08x\n",
@@ -957,8 +957,8 @@ void HELPER(wptlb)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t p, uint32_t v)
unsigned segment = p & XTENSA_MPU_SEGMENT_MASK;
if (segment < env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments) {
- env->mpu_fg[segment].vaddr = v & -env->config->mpu_align;
- env->mpu_fg[segment].attr = p & XTENSA_MPU_ATTR_MASK;
+ env->mpu.fg[segment].vaddr = v & -env->config->mpu_align;
+ env->mpu.fg[segment].attr = p & XTENSA_MPU_ATTR_MASK;
env->sregs[MPUENB] = deposit32(env->sregs[MPUENB], segment, 1, v);
tlb_flush(env_cpu(env));
}
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(rptlb0)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t s)
unsigned segment = s & XTENSA_MPU_SEGMENT_MASK;
if (segment < env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments) {
- return env->mpu_fg[segment].vaddr |
+ return env->mpu.fg[segment].vaddr |
extract32(env->sregs[MPUENB], segment, 1);
} else {
return 0;
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(rptlb1)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t s)
unsigned segment = s & XTENSA_MPU_SEGMENT_MASK;
if (segment < env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments) {
- return env->mpu_fg[segment].attr;
+ return env->mpu.fg[segment].attr;
} else {
return 0;
}
@@ -993,13 +993,13 @@ uint32_t HELPER(pptlb)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t v)
unsigned segment = XTENSA_MPU_PROBE_B;
unsigned bg_segment;
- nhits = xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->mpu_fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments,
+ nhits = xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->mpu.fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments,
v, &segment);
if (nhits > 1) {
HELPER(exception_cause_vaddr)(env, env->pc,
LOAD_STORE_TLB_MULTI_HIT_CAUSE, v);
} else if (nhits == 1 && (env->sregs[MPUENB] & (1u << segment))) {
- return env->mpu_fg[segment].attr | segment | XTENSA_MPU_PROBE_V;
+ return env->mpu.fg[segment].attr | segment | XTENSA_MPU_PROBE_V;
} else {
xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->config->mpu_bg,
env->config->n_mpu_bg_segments,
@@ -1017,14 +1017,14 @@ static int get_physical_addr_mpu(CPUXtensaState *env,
unsigned segment;
uint32_t attr;
- nhits = xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->mpu_fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments,
+ nhits = xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->mpu.fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments,
vaddr, &segment);
if (nhits > 1) {
return is_write < 2 ?
LOAD_STORE_TLB_MULTI_HIT_CAUSE :
INST_TLB_MULTI_HIT_CAUSE;
} else if (nhits == 1 && (env->sregs[MPUENB] & (1u << segment))) {
- attr = env->mpu_fg[segment].attr;
+ attr = env->mpu.fg[segment].attr;
} else {
xtensa_mpu_lookup(env->config->mpu_bg,
env->config->n_mpu_bg_segments,
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ void dump_mmu(CPUXtensaState *env)
dump_tlb(env, true);
} else if (xtensa_option_enabled(env->config, XTENSA_OPTION_MPU)) {
qemu_printf("Foreground map:\n");
- dump_mpu(env, env->mpu_fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments);
+ dump_mpu(env, env->mpu.fg, env->config->n_mpu_fg_segments);
qemu_printf("\nBackground map:\n");
dump_mpu(NULL, env->config->mpu_bg, env->config->n_mpu_bg_segments);
} else {
--
2.39.2On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Make separation of alternative xtensa memory management options state
> explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> ---
> target/xtensa/cpu.h | 18 +++++++++++++----
> target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/xtensa/cpu.h b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> index 8a423706d8c0..497325466397 100644
> --- a/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> @@ -326,11 +326,21 @@ typedef struct xtensa_tlb {
> unsigned nrefillentries;
> } xtensa_tlb;
>
> +typedef struct XtensaMMU {
> + xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> + xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> + unsigned autorefill_idx;
> +} XtensaMMU;
> +
> typedef struct xtensa_mpu_entry {
> uint32_t vaddr;
> uint32_t attr;
> } xtensa_mpu_entry;
>
> +typedef struct XtensaMPU {
> + xtensa_mpu_entry fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
> +} XtensaMPU;
> +
> typedef struct XtensaGdbReg {
> int targno;
> unsigned flags;
> @@ -526,10 +536,10 @@ struct CPUArchState {
> uint32_t exclusive_val;
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> - xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> - xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> - xtensa_mpu_entry mpu_fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
> - unsigned autorefill_idx;
> + union {
> + XtensaMMU mmu;
> + XtensaMPU mpu;
> + };
Is it really worth having this be a union ? I suspect it will
make adding migration/savevm support later more awkward.
> bool runstall;
> AddressSpace *address_space_er;
> MemoryRegion *system_er;
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
thanks
-- PMM
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:29 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Make separation of alternative xtensa memory management options state
> > explicit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > target/xtensa/cpu.h | 18 +++++++++++++----
> > target/xtensa/mmu_helper.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/xtensa/cpu.h b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> > index 8a423706d8c0..497325466397 100644
> > --- a/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/xtensa/cpu.h
> > @@ -326,11 +326,21 @@ typedef struct xtensa_tlb {
> > unsigned nrefillentries;
> > } xtensa_tlb;
> >
> > +typedef struct XtensaMMU {
> > + xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> > + xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> > + unsigned autorefill_idx;
> > +} XtensaMMU;
> > +
> > typedef struct xtensa_mpu_entry {
> > uint32_t vaddr;
> > uint32_t attr;
> > } xtensa_mpu_entry;
> >
> > +typedef struct XtensaMPU {
> > + xtensa_mpu_entry fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
> > +} XtensaMPU;
> > +
> > typedef struct XtensaGdbReg {
> > int targno;
> > unsigned flags;
> > @@ -526,10 +536,10 @@ struct CPUArchState {
> > uint32_t exclusive_val;
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > - xtensa_tlb_entry itlb[7][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> > - xtensa_tlb_entry dtlb[10][MAX_TLB_WAY_SIZE];
> > - xtensa_mpu_entry mpu_fg[MAX_MPU_FOREGROUND_SEGMENTS];
> > - unsigned autorefill_idx;
> > + union {
> > + XtensaMMU mmu;
> > + XtensaMPU mpu;
> > + };
>
> Is it really worth having this be a union ? I suspect it will
> make adding migration/savevm support later more awkward.
I have a draft implementation of savevm for xtensa and I did this part
using subsections with the .needed callback checking whether the
MMU or MPU option is enabled in the config. I wonder where the
awkwardness is expected.
> Otherwise
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Thanks!
-- Max
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 18:45, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:29 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > + union {
> > > + XtensaMMU mmu;
> > > + XtensaMPU mpu;
> > > + };
> >
> > Is it really worth having this be a union ? I suspect it will
> > make adding migration/savevm support later more awkward.
>
> I have a draft implementation of savevm for xtensa and I did this part
> using subsections with the .needed callback checking whether the
> MMU or MPU option is enabled in the config. I wonder where the
> awkwardness is expected.
Oh, well if it works that's fine I guess. I was kind of thinking
that if you didn't have the union you could avoid having
subsections entirely.
On Arm we don't try to save space in the CPU struct by
using unions, even though some fields are A-profile
specific and some are R or M-profile specific.
-- PMM
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.