[RFC 5/7] virtio-iommu: Remove the implementation of iommu_set_iova_ranges

Eric Auger posted 7 patches 10 months, 2 weeks ago
Maintainers: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
There is a newer version of this series
[RFC 5/7] virtio-iommu: Remove the implementation of iommu_set_iova_ranges
Posted by Eric Auger 10 months, 2 weeks ago
Now that we use PCIIOMMUOps to convey information about usable IOVA
ranges we do not to implement the iommu_set_iova_ranges IOMMU MR
callback.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
 hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 67 ----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
index 716a3fcfbf..1e2fc86f2f 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
@@ -1260,72 +1260,6 @@ static int virtio_iommu_set_page_size_mask(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr,
 }
 
 
-/**
- * virtio_iommu_set_iova_ranges: Conveys the usable IOVA ranges
- *
- * The function turns those into reserved ranges. Once some
- * reserved ranges have been set, new reserved regions cannot be
- * added outside of the original ones.
- *
- * @mr: IOMMU MR
- * @iova_ranges: list of usable IOVA ranges
- * @errp: error handle
- */
-static int virtio_iommu_set_iova_ranges(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr,
-                                        GList *iova_ranges,
-                                        Error **errp)
-{
-    IOMMUDevice *sdev = container_of(mr, IOMMUDevice, iommu_mr);
-    GList *current_ranges = sdev->host_resv_ranges;
-    GList *l, *tmp, *new_ranges = NULL;
-    int ret = -EINVAL;
-
-    /* check that each new resv region is included in an existing one */
-    if (sdev->host_resv_ranges) {
-        range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
-                            &new_ranges,
-                            0, UINT64_MAX);
-
-        for (tmp = new_ranges; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
-            Range *newr = (Range *)tmp->data;
-            bool included = false;
-
-            for (l = current_ranges; l; l = l->next) {
-                Range * r = (Range *)l->data;
-
-                if (range_contains_range(r, newr)) {
-                    included = true;
-                    break;
-                }
-            }
-            if (!included) {
-                goto error;
-            }
-        }
-        /* all new reserved ranges are included in existing ones */
-        ret = 0;
-        goto out;
-    }
-
-    if (sdev->probe_done) {
-        warn_report("%s: Notified about new host reserved regions after probe",
-                    mr->parent_obj.name);
-    }
-
-    range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
-                        &sdev->host_resv_ranges,
-                        0, UINT64_MAX);
-    rebuild_resv_regions(sdev);
-
-    return 0;
-error:
-    error_setg(errp, "IOMMU mr=%s Conflicting host reserved ranges set!",
-               mr->parent_obj.name);
-out:
-    g_list_free_full(new_ranges, g_free);
-    return ret;
-}
-
 static void virtio_iommu_system_reset(void *opaque)
 {
     VirtIOIOMMU *s = opaque;
@@ -1621,7 +1555,6 @@ static void virtio_iommu_memory_region_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
     imrc->replay = virtio_iommu_replay;
     imrc->notify_flag_changed = virtio_iommu_notify_flag_changed;
     imrc->iommu_set_page_size_mask = virtio_iommu_set_page_size_mask;
-    imrc->iommu_set_iova_ranges = virtio_iommu_set_iova_ranges;
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo virtio_iommu_info = {
-- 
2.41.0