[PULL 01/20] migration: Simplify initial conditionals in migration for better readability

peterx@redhat.com posted 20 patches 10 months, 2 weeks ago
Maintainers: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[PULL 01/20] migration: Simplify initial conditionals in migration for better readability
Posted by peterx@redhat.com 10 months, 2 weeks ago
From: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>

The inital conditional statements in qmp migration functions is harder
to understand than necessary. It is better to get all errors out of
the way in the beginning itself to have better readability and error
handling.

Signed-off-by: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>
Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205080039.197615-1-het.gala@nutanix.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 migration/migration.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
index 98c5c3e140..2365a3a13c 100644
--- a/migration/migration.c
+++ b/migration/migration.c
@@ -523,28 +523,26 @@ static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, bool has_channels,
     /*
      * Having preliminary checks for uri and channel
      */
-    if (uri && has_channels) {
-        error_setg(errp, "'uri' and 'channels' arguments are mutually "
-                   "exclusive; exactly one of the two should be present in "
-                   "'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
+    if (!uri == !channels) {
+        error_setg(errp, "need either 'uri' or 'channels' argument");
         return;
-    } else if (channels) {
+    }
+
+    if (channels) {
         /* To verify that Migrate channel list has only item */
         if (channels->next) {
             error_setg(errp, "Channel list has more than one entries");
             return;
         }
         addr = channels->value->addr;
-    } else if (uri) {
+    }
+
+    if (uri) {
         /* caller uses the old URI syntax */
         if (!migrate_uri_parse(uri, &channel, errp)) {
             return;
         }
         addr = channel->addr;
-    } else {
-        error_setg(errp, "neither 'uri' or 'channels' argument are "
-                   "specified in 'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
-        return;
     }
 
     /* transport mechanism not suitable for migration? */
@@ -1924,28 +1922,26 @@ void qmp_migrate(const char *uri, bool has_channels,
     /*
      * Having preliminary checks for uri and channel
      */
-    if (uri && has_channels) {
-        error_setg(errp, "'uri' and 'channels' arguments are mutually "
-                   "exclusive; exactly one of the two should be present in "
-                   "'migrate' qmp command ");
+    if (!uri == !channels) {
+        error_setg(errp, "need either 'uri' or 'channels' argument");
         return;
-    } else if (channels) {
+    }
+
+    if (channels) {
         /* To verify that Migrate channel list has only item */
         if (channels->next) {
             error_setg(errp, "Channel list has more than one entries");
             return;
         }
         addr = channels->value->addr;
-    } else if (uri) {
+    }
+
+    if (uri) {
         /* caller uses the old URI syntax */
         if (!migrate_uri_parse(uri, &channel, errp)) {
             return;
         }
         addr = channel->addr;
-    } else {
-        error_setg(errp, "neither 'uri' or 'channels' argument are "
-                   "specified in 'migrate' qmp command ");
-        return;
     }
 
     /* transport mechanism not suitable for migration? */
-- 
2.43.0