From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
+ ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
+ ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
+ ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
@@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
+ /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
+ MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
+ MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
+ MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),
+
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
> + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
> + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
> + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
> @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
>
> MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
>
> + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
> + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
> + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
> + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),
What happens to the existing J property?
Alistair
> +
> MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
> MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
> MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused.
I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions
like Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme.
Do you think it should be removed?
пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
> > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
> riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
> >
> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
> >
> > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),
>
> What happens to the existing J property?
>
>
> Alistair
>
> > +
> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:23 PM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused.
I suspect you are right, it would be worth confirming though.
> I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions like Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme.
> Do you think it should be removed?
It sounds like it should be removed then
Alistair
>
>
> пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
>> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
>> > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
>> >
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
>> >
>> > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),
>>
>> What happens to the existing J property?
>>
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>> > +
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
>> > --
>> > 2.34.1
>> >
>> >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.