QEMU populates the apic_state attribute of x86 CPUs if supported by real
hardware. Even when the APIC is globally disabled by a guest, this attribute
stays populated. This means that the APIC code paths are still used in this
case. However, chapter 10.4.3 of [1] requires that:
When IA32_APIC_BASE[11] is 0, the processor is functionally equivalent to an
IA-32 processor without an on-chip APIC. The CPUID feature flag for the APIC
[...] is also set to 0.
Fix this by checking the APIC feature flag rather than apic_state when deciding
whether PIC or APIC behavior is required. This fixes some real-world BIOSes.
Notice that presence of the CPUID_APIC flag implies that apic_state is non-NULL.
[1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Vol. 3A:
System Programming Guide, Part 1
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
---
hw/i386/x86.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
index 2b6291ad8d..a753d1aeca 100644
--- a/hw/i386/x86.c
+++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
@@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static void x86_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp)
CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
- if (!cpu->apic_state) {
- cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI);
- } else {
+ if (cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC) {
apic_deliver_nmi(cpu->apic_state);
+ } else {
+ cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI);
}
}
}
@@ -551,8 +551,8 @@ static void pic_irq_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
trace_x86_pic_interrupt(irq, level);
- if (cpu->apic_state && !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() &&
- !whpx_apic_in_platform()) {
+ if ((cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC) &&
+ !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() && !whpx_apic_in_platform()) {
CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
if (apic_accept_pic_intr(cpu->apic_state)) {
--
2.43.0
Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> writes: > QEMU populates the apic_state attribute of x86 CPUs if supported by real > hardware. Even when the APIC is globally disabled by a guest, this attribute > stays populated. This means that the APIC code paths are still used in this > case. However, chapter 10.4.3 of [1] requires that: > > When IA32_APIC_BASE[11] is 0, the processor is functionally equivalent to an > IA-32 processor without an on-chip APIC. The CPUID feature flag for the APIC > [...] is also set to 0. > > Fix this by checking the APIC feature flag rather than apic_state when deciding > whether PIC or APIC behavior is required. This fixes some real-world BIOSes. > > Notice that presence of the CPUID_APIC flag implies that apic_state is non-NULL. > > [1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Vol. 3A: > System Programming Guide, Part 1 > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> > --- > hw/i386/x86.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c > index 2b6291ad8d..a753d1aeca 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/x86.c > +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c > @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static void x86_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp) > CPU_FOREACH(cs) { > X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs); > > - if (!cpu->apic_state) { > - cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI); > - } else { > + if (cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC) { You could assert the relationship between the feature and ->apic_state with: g_assert(cpu->apic_state) But probably unnecessary in the grand scheme of things. Anyway: Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
Am 3. Januar 2024 09:12:24 UTC schrieb "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>: >Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> writes: > >> QEMU populates the apic_state attribute of x86 CPUs if supported by real >> hardware. Even when the APIC is globally disabled by a guest, this attribute >> stays populated. This means that the APIC code paths are still used in this >> case. However, chapter 10.4.3 of [1] requires that: >> >> When IA32_APIC_BASE[11] is 0, the processor is functionally equivalent to an >> IA-32 processor without an on-chip APIC. The CPUID feature flag for the APIC >> [...] is also set to 0. >> >> Fix this by checking the APIC feature flag rather than apic_state when deciding >> whether PIC or APIC behavior is required. This fixes some real-world BIOSes. >> >> Notice that presence of the CPUID_APIC flag implies that apic_state is non-NULL. >> >> [1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Vol. 3A: >> System Programming Guide, Part 1 >> >> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> >> --- >> hw/i386/x86.c | 10 +++++----- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c >> index 2b6291ad8d..a753d1aeca 100644 >> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c >> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c >> @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static void x86_nmi(NMIState *n, int cpu_index, Error **errp) >> CPU_FOREACH(cs) { >> X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs); >> >> - if (!cpu->apic_state) { >> - cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI); >> - } else { >> + if (cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC) { > >You could assert the relationship between the feature and ->apic_state with: > > g_assert(cpu->apic_state) > >But probably unnecessary in the grand scheme of things. I like the idea so I'll respin. Thanks, Bernhard > Anyway: > >Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.