[PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI

ankita@nvidia.com posted 2 patches 11 months, 1 week ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
There is a newer version of this series
hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.c         | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/acpi/meson.build                      |   1 +
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c                 |   3 +
include/hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.h |  53 +++++++
qapi/qom.json                            |  17 +++
5 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.c
create mode 100644 include/hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.h
[PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI
Posted by ankita@nvidia.com 11 months, 1 week ago
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>

There are upcoming devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access
their memory. It is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA nodes separate
from the sysmem node to the OS. The ACPI spec provides a scheme in SRAT
called Generic Initiator Affinity Structure [1] to allow an association
between a Proximity Domain (PXM) and a Generic Initiator (GI) (e.g.
heterogeneous processors and accelerators, GPUs, and I/O devices with
integrated compute or DMA engines).

While a single node per device may cover several use cases, it is however
insufficient for a full utilization of the NVIDIA GPUs MIG
(Mult-Instance GPUs) [2] feature. The feature allows partitioning of the
GPU device resources (including device memory) into several (upto 8)
isolated instances. Each of the partitioned memory requires a dedicated NUMA
node to operate. The partitions are not fixed and they can be created/deleted
at runtime.

Linux OS does not provide a means to dynamically create/destroy NUMA nodes
and such feature implementation is expected to be non-trivial. The nodes
that OS discovers at the boot time while parsing SRAT remains fixed. So we
utilize the GI Affinity structures that allows association between nodes
and devices. Multiple GI structures per device/BDF is possible, allowing
creation of multiple nodes in the VM by exposing unique PXM in each of these
structures.

Implement the mechanism to build the GI affinity structures as Qemu currently
does not. Introduce a new acpi-generic-initiator object that allows an
association of a set of nodes with a device. During SRAT creation, all such
objected are identified and used to add the GI Affinity Structures. Currently,
only PCI device is supported. On a multi device system, each device supporting
the features needs a unique acpi-generic-initiator object with its own set of
NUMA nodes associated to it.

The admin will create a range of 8 nodes and associate that with the device
using the acpi-generic-initiator object. While a configuration of less than
8 nodes per device is allowed, such configuration will prevent utilization of
the feature to the fullest. This setting is applicable to all the Grace+Hopper
systems. The following is an example of the Qemu command line arguments to
create 8 nodes and link them to the device 'dev0':

-numa node,nodeid=2 -numa node,nodeid=3 -numa node,nodeid=4 \
-numa node,nodeid=5 -numa node,nodeid=6 -numa node,nodeid=7 \
-numa node,nodeid=8 -numa node,nodeid=9 \
-device vfio-pci-nohotplug,host=0009:01:00.0,bus=pcie.0,addr=04.0,rombar=0,id=dev0 \
-object acpi-generic-initiator,id=gi0,pci-dev=dev0,host-nodes=2-9 \

The performance benefits can be realized by providing the NUMA node distances
appropriately (through libvirt tags or Qemu params). The admin can get the
distance among nodes in hardware using `numactl -H`.

This series goes along with the vfio-pci variant driver [3] under review.

Applied over v8.2.0-rc4.

[1] ACPI Spec 6.3, Section 5.2.16.6
[2] https://www.nvidia.com/en-in/technologies/multi-instance-gpu
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212184613.3237-1-ankita@nvidia.com/

Link for v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231203060245.31593-1-ankita@nvidia.com/

v5 -> v6
- Updated commit message for the [1/2] and the cover letter.
- Updated the acpi-generic-initiator object comment description for
  clarity on the input host-nodes.
- Rebased to v8.2.0-rc4.

v4 -> v5
- Removed acpi-dev option until full support.
- The numa nodes are saved as bitmap instead of uint16List.
- Replaced asserts to exit calls.
- Addressed other miscellaneous comments.

v3 -> v4
- changed the ':' delimited way to a uint16 array to communicate the
nodes associated with the device.
- added asserts to handle invalid inputs.
- addressed other miscellaneous v3 comments.

v2 -> v3
- changed param to accept a ':' delimited list of numa nodes, instead
of a range.
- Removed nvidia-acpi-generic-initiator object.
- Addressed miscellaneous comments in v2.

v1 -> v2
- Removed dependency on sysfs to communicate the feature with variant module.
- Use GI Affinity SRAT structure instead of Memory Affinity.
- No DSDT entries needed to communicate the PXM for the device. SRAT GI
structure is used instead.
- New objects introduced to establish link between device and nodes.

Ankit Agrawal (2):
  qom: new object to associate device to numa node
  hw/acpi: Implement the SRAT GI affinity structure

 hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.c         | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/acpi/meson.build                      |   1 +
 hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c                 |   3 +
 include/hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.h |  53 +++++++
 qapi/qom.json                            |  17 +++
 5 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.c
 create mode 100644 include/hw/acpi/acpi-generic-initiator.h

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI
Posted by Jonathan Cameron via 10 months, 4 weeks ago
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 10:26:01 +0530
<ankita@nvidia.com> wrote:

> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> There are upcoming devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access
> their memory. It is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA nodes separate
> from the sysmem node to the OS. The ACPI spec provides a scheme in SRAT
> called Generic Initiator Affinity Structure [1] to allow an association
> between a Proximity Domain (PXM) and a Generic Initiator (GI) (e.g.
> heterogeneous processors and accelerators, GPUs, and I/O devices with
> integrated compute or DMA engines).
> 
> While a single node per device may cover several use cases, it is however
> insufficient for a full utilization of the NVIDIA GPUs MIG
> (Mult-Instance GPUs) [2] feature. The feature allows partitioning of the
> GPU device resources (including device memory) into several (upto 8)
> isolated instances. Each of the partitioned memory requires a dedicated NUMA
> node to operate. The partitions are not fixed and they can be created/deleted
> at runtime.
> 
> Linux OS does not provide a means to dynamically create/destroy NUMA nodes
> and such feature implementation is expected to be non-trivial. The nodes
> that OS discovers at the boot time while parsing SRAT remains fixed. So we
> utilize the GI Affinity structures that allows association between nodes
> and devices. Multiple GI structures per device/BDF is possible, allowing
> creation of multiple nodes in the VM by exposing unique PXM in each of these
> structures.
> 
> Implement the mechanism to build the GI affinity structures as Qemu currently
> does not. Introduce a new acpi-generic-initiator object that allows an
> association of a set of nodes with a device. During SRAT creation, all such
> objected are identified and used to add the GI Affinity Structures. Currently,
> only PCI device is supported. On a multi device system, each device supporting
> the features needs a unique acpi-generic-initiator object with its own set of
> NUMA nodes associated to it.
> 
> The admin will create a range of 8 nodes and associate that with the device
> using the acpi-generic-initiator object. While a configuration of less than
> 8 nodes per device is allowed, such configuration will prevent utilization of
> the feature to the fullest. This setting is applicable to all the Grace+Hopper
> systems. The following is an example of the Qemu command line arguments to
> create 8 nodes and link them to the device 'dev0':
> 
> -numa node,nodeid=2 -numa node,nodeid=3 -numa node,nodeid=4 \
> -numa node,nodeid=5 -numa node,nodeid=6 -numa node,nodeid=7 \
> -numa node,nodeid=8 -numa node,nodeid=9 \
> -device vfio-pci-nohotplug,host=0009:01:00.0,bus=pcie.0,addr=04.0,rombar=0,id=dev0 \
> -object acpi-generic-initiator,id=gi0,pci-dev=dev0,host-nodes=2-9 \
> 

I'd find it helpful to see the resulting chunk of SRAT for these examples
(disassembled) in this cover letter and the patches (where there are more examples).
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI
Posted by Ankit Agrawal 10 months, 3 weeks ago
>>
>> -numa node,nodeid=2 -numa node,nodeid=3 -numa node,nodeid=4 \
>> -numa node,nodeid=5 -numa node,nodeid=6 -numa node,nodeid=7 \
>> -numa node,nodeid=8 -numa node,nodeid=9 \
>> -device vfio-pci-nohotplug,host=0009:01:00.0,bus=pcie.0,addr=04.0,rombar=0,id=dev0 \
>> -object acpi-generic-initiator,id=gi0,pci-dev=dev0,host-nodes=2-9 \
>>
>
> I'd find it helpful to see the resulting chunk of SRAT for these examples
> (disassembled) in this cover letter and the patches (where there are more examples).

Ack. I'll document the resulting SRAT table as well.
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI
Posted by Michael S. Tsirkin 9 months, 2 weeks ago
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:05:27AM +0000, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> -numa node,nodeid=2 -numa node,nodeid=3 -numa node,nodeid=4 \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=5 -numa node,nodeid=6 -numa node,nodeid=7 \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=8 -numa node,nodeid=9 \
> >> -device vfio-pci-nohotplug,host=0009:01:00.0,bus=pcie.0,addr=04.0,rombar=0,id=dev0 \
> >> -object acpi-generic-initiator,id=gi0,pci-dev=dev0,host-nodes=2-9 \
> >>
> >
> > I'd find it helpful to see the resulting chunk of SRAT for these examples
> > (disassembled) in this cover letter and the patches (where there are more examples).
> 
> Ack. I'll document the resulting SRAT table as well.

Still didn't happen so this is dropped for now.
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] acpi: report numa nodes for device memory using GI
Posted by Ankit Agrawal 9 months, 2 weeks ago
>> >
>> > I'd find it helpful to see the resulting chunk of SRAT for these examples
>> > (disassembled) in this cover letter and the patches (where there are more examples).
>>
>> Ack. I'll document the resulting SRAT table as well.
>
> Still didn't happen so this is dropped for now.

Hi Michael, does this mean it is dropped from Qemu v9.0?
FWIW, I'll post the next version incorporating the feedbacks by next week.