[PATCH v13 06/26] target/riscv/tcg: add 'zic64b' support

Daniel Henrique Barboza posted 26 patches 11 months, 2 weeks ago
Maintainers: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>, Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>, Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>, Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>, Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
[PATCH v13 06/26] target/riscv/tcg: add 'zic64b' support
Posted by Daniel Henrique Barboza 11 months, 2 weeks ago
zic64b is defined in the RVA22U64 profile [1] as a named feature for
"Cache blocks must be 64 bytes in size, naturally aligned in the address
space". It's a fantasy name for 64 bytes cache blocks. The RVA22U64
profile mandates this feature, meaning that applications using this
profile expects 64 bytes cache blocks.

To make the upcoming RVA22U64 implementation complete, we'll zic64b as
a 'named feature', not a regular extension. This means that:

- it won't be exposed to users;
- it won't be written in riscv,isa.

This will be extended to other named extensions in the future, so we're
creating some common boilerplate for them as well.

zic64b is default to 'true' since we're already using 64 bytes blocks.
If any cache block size (cbo{m,p,z}_blocksize) is changed to something
different than 64, zic64b is set to 'false'.

Our profile implementation will then be able to check the current state
of zic64b and take the appropriate action (e.g. throw a warning).

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/releases/download/v1.0/profiles.pdf

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c         |  6 ++++++
 target/riscv/cpu.h         |  1 +
 target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     |  1 +
 target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 86e3514cc8..b2e539f807 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1444,6 +1444,12 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
+const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[] = {
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zic64b", zic64b, true),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
+};
+
 /* Deprecated entries marked for future removal */
 const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[] = {
     MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zifencei", ext_zifencei, true),
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index d74b361be6..5fb4ca2324 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ typedef struct RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig {
 extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[];
 extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[];
 extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[];
+extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[];
 extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[];
 extern Property riscv_cpu_options[];
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
index bd2ff87cc8..90f18eb601 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
     bool ext_smepmp;
     bool rvv_ta_all_1s;
     bool rvv_ma_all_1s;
+    bool zic64b;
 
     uint32_t mvendorid;
     uint64_t marchid;
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index aee98db6f8..3319ba8e4e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t ext_offset)
     g_assert_not_reached();
 }
 
+static bool cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(uint32_t ext_offset)
+{
+    const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *feat;
+
+    for (feat = riscv_cpu_named_features; feat->name != NULL; feat++) {
+        if (feat->offset == ext_offset) {
+            return true;
+        }
+    }
+
+    return false;
+}
+
 static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState *env,
                                         uint32_t ext_offset)
 {
@@ -123,6 +136,10 @@ static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState *env,
         return;
     }
 
+    if (cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(ext_offset)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
     ext_priv_ver = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
 
     if (env->priv_ver < ext_priv_ver) {
@@ -293,6 +310,13 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disable_priv_spec_isa_exts(RISCVCPU *cpu)
     }
 }
 
+static void riscv_cpu_update_named_features(RISCVCPU *cpu)
+{
+    cpu->cfg.zic64b = cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize == 64 &&
+                      cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize == 64 &&
+                      cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize == 64;
+}
+
 /*
  * Check consistency between chosen extensions while setting
  * cpu->cfg accordingly.
@@ -657,6 +681,8 @@ void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
         return;
     }
 
+    riscv_cpu_update_named_features(cpu);
+
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_smepmp && !cpu->cfg.pmp) {
         /*
          * Enhanced PMP should only be available
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v13 06/26] target/riscv/tcg: add 'zic64b' support
Posted by Alistair Francis 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:54 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> zic64b is defined in the RVA22U64 profile [1] as a named feature for
> "Cache blocks must be 64 bytes in size, naturally aligned in the address
> space". It's a fantasy name for 64 bytes cache blocks. The RVA22U64
> profile mandates this feature, meaning that applications using this
> profile expects 64 bytes cache blocks.
>
> To make the upcoming RVA22U64 implementation complete, we'll zic64b as
> a 'named feature', not a regular extension. This means that:
>
> - it won't be exposed to users;
> - it won't be written in riscv,isa.
>
> This will be extended to other named extensions in the future, so we're
> creating some common boilerplate for them as well.
>
> zic64b is default to 'true' since we're already using 64 bytes blocks.
> If any cache block size (cbo{m,p,z}_blocksize) is changed to something
> different than 64, zic64b is set to 'false'.
>
> Our profile implementation will then be able to check the current state
> of zic64b and take the appropriate action (e.g. throw a warning).
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/releases/download/v1.0/profiles.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c         |  6 ++++++
>  target/riscv/cpu.h         |  1 +
>  target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     |  1 +
>  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 86e3514cc8..b2e539f807 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,12 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>
> +const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[] = {
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zic64b", zic64b, true),
> +
> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};
> +
>  /* Deprecated entries marked for future removal */
>  const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[] = {
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zifencei", ext_zifencei, true),
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index d74b361be6..5fb4ca2324 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ typedef struct RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig {
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[];
> +extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[];
>  extern Property riscv_cpu_options[];
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> index bd2ff87cc8..90f18eb601 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
>      bool ext_smepmp;
>      bool rvv_ta_all_1s;
>      bool rvv_ma_all_1s;
> +    bool zic64b;
>
>      uint32_t mvendorid;
>      uint64_t marchid;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index aee98db6f8..3319ba8e4e 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t ext_offset)
>      g_assert_not_reached();
>  }
>
> +static bool cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(uint32_t ext_offset)
> +{
> +    const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *feat;
> +
> +    for (feat = riscv_cpu_named_features; feat->name != NULL; feat++) {
> +        if (feat->offset == ext_offset) {
> +            return true;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState *env,
>                                          uint32_t ext_offset)
>  {
> @@ -123,6 +136,10 @@ static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState *env,
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    if (cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(ext_offset)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      ext_priv_ver = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
>
>      if (env->priv_ver < ext_priv_ver) {
> @@ -293,6 +310,13 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disable_priv_spec_isa_exts(RISCVCPU *cpu)
>      }
>  }
>
> +static void riscv_cpu_update_named_features(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    cpu->cfg.zic64b = cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize == 64 &&
> +                      cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize == 64 &&
> +                      cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize == 64;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Check consistency between chosen extensions while setting
>   * cpu->cfg accordingly.
> @@ -657,6 +681,8 @@ void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    riscv_cpu_update_named_features(cpu);
> +
>      if (cpu->cfg.ext_smepmp && !cpu->cfg.pmp) {
>          /*
>           * Enhanced PMP should only be available
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>