Per https://docs.xilinx.com/r/en-US/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm/Message-Format
Message Format
The same message format is used for RXFIFO, TXFIFO, and TXHPB.
Each message includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read
and write all four words regardless of the actual number of data
bytes and valid fields in the message.
There is no mention in this reference manual about what the
hardware does when not all four words are written. To fix the
reported underflow behavior when DATA2 register is written,
I choose to fill the data with the previous content of the
ID / DLC / DATA1 registers, which is how I expect hardware
would do.
Note there is no hardware flag raised under such condition.
Reported-by: Qiang Liu <cyruscyliu@gmail.com>
Fixes: 98e5d7a2b7 ("hw/net/can: Introduce Xilinx ZynqMP CAN controller")
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1425
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
---
hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c
index e93e6c5e19..58938b574e 100644
--- a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c
+++ b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c
@@ -434,6 +434,51 @@ static bool tx_ready_check(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s)
return true;
}
+static void read_tx_frame(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo, uint32_t *data)
+{
+ unsigned used = fifo32_num_used(fifo);
+ bool is_txhpb = fifo == &s->txhpb_fifo;
+
+ assert(used > 0);
+ used %= CAN_FRAME_SIZE;
+
+ /*
+ * Frame Message Format
+ *
+ * Each frame includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read and write
+ * all four words regardless of the actual number of data bytes and valid
+ * fields in the message.
+ * If software misbehave (not writting all four words), we use the previous
+ * registers content to initialize each missing word.
+ */
+ if (used > 0) {
+ /* ID, DLC, DATA1 missing */
+ data[0] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_ID : R_TXFIFO_ID];
+ } else {
+ data[0] = fifo32_pop(fifo);
+ }
+ if (used == 1 || used == 2) {
+ /* DLC, DATA1 missing */
+ data[1] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DLC : R_TXFIFO_DLC];
+ } else {
+ data[1] = fifo32_pop(fifo);
+ }
+ if (used == 1) {
+ /* DATA1 missing */
+ data[2] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DATA1 : R_TXFIFO_DATA1];
+ } else {
+ data[2] = fifo32_pop(fifo);
+ }
+ /* DATA2 triggered the transfer thus is always available */
+ data[3] = fifo32_pop(fifo);
+
+ if (used) {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "%s: Incomplete CAN frame (only %u/%u slots used)\n",
+ TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_CAN, used, CAN_FRAME_SIZE);
+ }
+}
+
static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo)
{
qemu_can_frame frame;
@@ -451,9 +496,7 @@ static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo)
}
while (!fifo32_is_empty(fifo)) {
- for (i = 0; i < CAN_FRAME_SIZE; i++) {
- data[i] = fifo32_pop(fifo);
- }
+ read_tx_frame(s, fifo, data);
if (ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(s->regs, STATUS_REGISTER, LBACK)) {
/*
--
2.41.0
Hi, On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Per https://docs.xilinx.com/r/en-US/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm/Message-Format > > Message Format > > The same message format is used for RXFIFO, TXFIFO, and TXHPB. > Each message includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read > and write all four words regardless of the actual number of data > bytes and valid fields in the message. > > There is no mention in this reference manual about what the > hardware does when not all four words are written. To fix the > reported underflow behavior when DATA2 register is written, > I choose to fill the data with the previous content of the > ID / DLC / DATA1 registers, which is how I expect hardware > would do. > > Note there is no hardware flag raised under such condition. > > Reported-by: Qiang Liu <cyruscyliu@gmail.com> > Fixes: 98e5d7a2b7 ("hw/net/can: Introduce Xilinx ZynqMP CAN controller") > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1425 > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com> > --- > hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > index e93e6c5e19..58938b574e 100644 > --- a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > +++ b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > @@ -434,6 +434,51 @@ static bool tx_ready_check(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s) > return true; > } > > +static void read_tx_frame(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo, uint32_t *data) > +{ > + unsigned used = fifo32_num_used(fifo); > + bool is_txhpb = fifo == &s->txhpb_fifo; > + > + assert(used > 0); > + used %= CAN_FRAME_SIZE; > + > + /* > + * Frame Message Format > + * > + * Each frame includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read and write > + * all four words regardless of the actual number of data bytes and valid > + * fields in the message. > + * If software misbehave (not writting all four words), we use the previous %s/writting/writing > + * registers content to initialize each missing word. > + */ > + if (used > 0) { > + /* ID, DLC, DATA1 missing */ Code is correct but i feel This comment is confusing. ID is missing for sure if user > 0 but same is not the case for DLC and DATA1. > + data[0] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_ID : R_TXFIFO_ID]; > + } else { > + data[0] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + if (used == 1 || used == 2) { > + /* DLC, DATA1 missing */ Same here DLC is missing for sure but DATA1 is not for used == 2. > + data[1] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DLC : R_TXFIFO_DLC]; > + } else { > + data[1] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + if (used == 1) { > + /* DATA1 missing */ May be we remove all these individual comments and write a common comment before the first check(if(used > 0)). Something like this: /* * If used is 1 then ID, DLC and DATA1 are missing. * * if used is 2 then ID and DLC are missing. * * if used is 3 then only ID is missing. */ Code looks correct to me. So, With above minor changes in code comments: Reviewed-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> > + data[2] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DATA1 : R_TXFIFO_DATA1]; > + } else { > + data[2] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + /* DATA2 triggered the transfer thus is always available */ > + data[3] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + > + if (used) { > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, > + "%s: Incomplete CAN frame (only %u/%u slots used)\n", > + TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_CAN, used, CAN_FRAME_SIZE); > + } > +} > + > static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo) > { > qemu_can_frame frame; > @@ -451,9 +496,7 @@ static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo) > } > > while (!fifo32_is_empty(fifo)) { > - for (i = 0; i < CAN_FRAME_SIZE; i++) { > - data[i] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > - } > + read_tx_frame(s, fifo, data); > > if (ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(s->regs, STATUS_REGISTER, LBACK)) { > /* > -- > 2.41.0 >
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Per https://docs.xilinx.com/r/en-US/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm/Message-Format > > Message Format > > The same message format is used for RXFIFO, TXFIFO, and TXHPB. > Each message includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read > and write all four words regardless of the actual number of data > bytes and valid fields in the message. > > There is no mention in this reference manual about what the > hardware does when not all four words are written. To fix the > reported underflow behavior when DATA2 register is written, > I choose to fill the data with the previous content of the > ID / DLC / DATA1 registers, which is how I expect hardware > would do. > > Note there is no hardware flag raised under such condition. > > Reported-by: Qiang Liu <cyruscyliu@gmail.com> > Fixes: 98e5d7a2b7 ("hw/net/can: Introduce Xilinx ZynqMP CAN controller") > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1425 > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com> -above line +below line Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com> > --- > hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > index e93e6c5e19..58938b574e 100644 > --- a/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > +++ b/hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c > @@ -434,6 +434,51 @@ static bool tx_ready_check(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s) > return true; > } > > +static void read_tx_frame(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo, uint32_t *data) > +{ > + unsigned used = fifo32_num_used(fifo); > + bool is_txhpb = fifo == &s->txhpb_fifo; > + > + assert(used > 0); > + used %= CAN_FRAME_SIZE; > + > + /* > + * Frame Message Format > + * > + * Each frame includes four words (16 bytes). Software must read and write > + * all four words regardless of the actual number of data bytes and valid > + * fields in the message. > + * If software misbehave (not writting all four words), we use the previous > + * registers content to initialize each missing word. > + */ > + if (used > 0) { > + /* ID, DLC, DATA1 missing */ > + data[0] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_ID : R_TXFIFO_ID]; > + } else { > + data[0] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + if (used == 1 || used == 2) { > + /* DLC, DATA1 missing */ > + data[1] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DLC : R_TXFIFO_DLC]; > + } else { > + data[1] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + if (used == 1) { > + /* DATA1 missing */ > + data[2] = s->regs[is_txhpb ? R_TXHPB_DATA1 : R_TXFIFO_DATA1]; > + } else { > + data[2] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + } > + /* DATA2 triggered the transfer thus is always available */ > + data[3] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > + > + if (used) { > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, > + "%s: Incomplete CAN frame (only %u/%u slots used)\n", > + TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_CAN, used, CAN_FRAME_SIZE); > + } > +} > + > static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo) > { > qemu_can_frame frame; > @@ -451,9 +496,7 @@ static void transfer_fifo(XlnxZynqMPCANState *s, Fifo32 *fifo) > } > > while (!fifo32_is_empty(fifo)) { > - for (i = 0; i < CAN_FRAME_SIZE; i++) { > - data[i] = fifo32_pop(fifo); > - } > + read_tx_frame(s, fifo, data); > > if (ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(s->regs, STATUS_REGISTER, LBACK)) { > /* > -- > 2.41.0 >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.