[v5] Unified CPU type check

[PATCH v5 26/31] machine: Print CPU model name instead of CPU type name

Gavin Shan posted 31 patches 1 year ago

Diff against v3 v6 v7 v8 v9
Download mbox

Maintainers: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>, Strahinja Jankovic <strahinja.p.jankovic@gmail.com>, Subbaraya Sundeep <sundeep.lkml@gmail.com>, Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>, Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>, Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@semihalf.com>, Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>, Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, Vijai Kumar K <vijai@behindbytes.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>, Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>, Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>, Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>, Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>, Michael Rolnik <mrolnik@gmail.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>, Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>

There is a newer version of this series

Expand all Fold all

[PATCH v5 26/31] machine: Print CPU model name instead of CPU type name

Posted by Gavin Shan 1 year ago

The names of supported CPU models instead of CPU types should be
printed when the user specified CPU type isn't supported, to be
consistent with the output from '-cpu ?'.

Correct the error messages to print CPU model names instead of CPU
type names.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
 hw/core/machine.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index 49e0bc874d..58512b4b89 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -1392,6 +1392,7 @@ static void is_cpu_type_supported(MachineState *machine, Error **errp)
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
     ObjectClass *oc = object_class_by_name(machine->cpu_type);
     CPUClass *cc;
+    char *model;
     int i;
 
     /*
@@ -1408,11 +1409,21 @@ static void is_cpu_type_supported(MachineState *machine, Error **errp)
 
         /* The user specified CPU type isn't valid */
         if (!mc->valid_cpu_types[i]) {
-            error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU type: %s", machine->cpu_type);
-            error_append_hint(errp, "The valid types are: %s",
-                              mc->valid_cpu_types[0]);
+            model = cpu_model_from_type(machine->cpu_type);
+            g_assert(model != NULL);
+            error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU type: %s", model);
+            g_free(model);
+
+            model = cpu_model_from_type(mc->valid_cpu_types[0]);
+            g_assert(model != NULL);
+            error_append_hint(errp, "The valid types are: %s", model);
+            g_free(model);
+
             for (i = 1; mc->valid_cpu_types[i]; i++) {
-                error_append_hint(errp, ", %s", mc->valid_cpu_types[i]);
+                model = cpu_model_from_type(mc->valid_cpu_types[i]);
+                g_assert(model != NULL);
+                error_append_hint(errp, ", %s", model);
+                g_free(model);
             }
 
             error_append_hint(errp, "\n");
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v5 26/31] machine: Print CPU model name instead of CPU type name

Posted by Richard Henderson 1 year ago

On 11/14/23 15:56, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The names of supported CPU models instead of CPU types should be
> printed when the user specified CPU type isn't supported, to be
> consistent with the output from '-cpu ?'.
> 
> Correct the error messages to print CPU model names instead of CPU
> type names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
>   hw/core/machine.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index 49e0bc874d..58512b4b89 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -1392,6 +1392,7 @@ static void is_cpu_type_supported(MachineState *machine, Error **errp)
>       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>       ObjectClass *oc = object_class_by_name(machine->cpu_type);
>       CPUClass *cc;
> +    char *model;

Move to inner block.

> @@ -1408,11 +1409,21 @@ static void is_cpu_type_supported(MachineState *machine, Error **errp)
>   
>           /* The user specified CPU type isn't valid */
>           if (!mc->valid_cpu_types[i]) {
> -            error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU type: %s", machine->cpu_type);
> -            error_append_hint(errp, "The valid types are: %s",
> -                              mc->valid_cpu_types[0]);
> +            model = cpu_model_from_type(machine->cpu_type);
> +            g_assert(model != NULL);
> +            error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU type: %s", model);

I see no reason for these asserts -- printf of NULL will print "(nil)".
Aborting in the middle of error reporting won't be helpful.



r~