[PATCH v2] test/qtest: Add API functions to capture IRQ toggling

Gustavo Romero posted 1 patch 1 year ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20231113230149.321304-1-gustavo.romero@linaro.org
Maintainers: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qtest/libqtest.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
[PATCH v2] test/qtest: Add API functions to capture IRQ toggling
Posted by Gustavo Romero 1 year ago
Currently, the QTest API does not provide a function to capture when an
IRQ line is raised or lowered, although the QTest Protocol already
reports such IRQ transitions. As a consequence, it is also not possible
to capture when an IRQ line is toggled. Functions like qtest_get_irq()
only read the current state of the intercepted IRQ lines, which is
already high (or low) when the function is called if the IRQ line is
toggled. Therefore, these functions miss the IRQ line state transitions.

This commit introduces two new API functions:
qtest_get_irq_raised_counter() and qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter().
These functions allow capturing the number of times an observed IRQ line
transitioned from low to high state or from high to low state,
respectively.

When used together, these new API functions then allow checking if one
or more pulses were generated (indicating if the IRQ line was toggled).

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
---
 tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/qtest/libqtest.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
index f33a210861..6ada4cae6e 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ struct QTestState
     int expected_status;
     bool big_endian;
     bool irq_level[MAX_IRQ];
+    uint64_t irq_raised_counter[MAX_IRQ];
+    uint64_t irq_lowered_counter[MAX_IRQ];
     GString *rx;
     QTestTransportOps ops;
     GList *pending_events;
@@ -498,6 +500,8 @@ static QTestState *qtest_init_internal(const char *qemu_bin,
     s->rx = g_string_new("");
     for (i = 0; i < MAX_IRQ; i++) {
         s->irq_level[i] = false;
+        s->irq_raised_counter[i] = 0;
+        s->irq_lowered_counter[i] = 0;
     }
 
     /*
@@ -689,8 +693,10 @@ redo:
         g_assert_cmpint(irq, <, MAX_IRQ);
 
         if (strcmp(words[1], "raise") == 0) {
+            s->irq_raised_counter[irq]++;
             s->irq_level[irq] = true;
         } else {
+            s->irq_lowered_counter[irq]++;
             s->irq_level[irq] = false;
         }
 
@@ -980,6 +986,22 @@ bool qtest_get_irq(QTestState *s, int num)
     return s->irq_level[num];
 }
 
+uint64_t qtest_get_irq_raised_counter(QTestState *s, int num)
+{
+    /* dummy operation in order to make sure irq is up to date */
+    qtest_inb(s, 0);
+
+    return s->irq_raised_counter[num];
+}
+
+uint64_t qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter(QTestState *s, int num)
+{
+    /* dummy operation in order to make sure irq is up to date */
+    qtest_inb(s, 0);
+
+    return s->irq_lowered_counter[num];
+}
+
 void qtest_module_load(QTestState *s, const char *prefix, const char *libname)
 {
     qtest_sendf(s, "module_load %s %s\n", prefix, libname);
@@ -1799,6 +1821,8 @@ QTestState *qtest_inproc_init(QTestState **s, bool log, const char* arch,
     qts->wstatus = 0;
     for (int i = 0; i < MAX_IRQ; i++) {
         qts->irq_level[i] = false;
+        qts->irq_raised_counter[i] = 0;
+        qts->irq_lowered_counter[i] = 0;
     }
 
     qtest_client_set_rx_handler(qts, qtest_client_inproc_recv_line);
diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.h b/tests/qtest/libqtest.h
index 6e3d3525bf..a2a16914dc 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.h
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.h
@@ -364,6 +364,34 @@ void qtest_module_load(QTestState *s, const char *prefix, const char *libname);
  */
 bool qtest_get_irq(QTestState *s, int num);
 
+/**
+ * qtest_get_irq_raised_counter:
+ * @s: #QTestState instance to operate on.
+ * @num: Interrupt to observe.
+ *
+ * This function can be used in conjunction with the
+ * qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter() to check if one or more pulses where
+ * generated on the observed interrupt.
+ *
+ * Returns: The number of times IRQ @num was raised, i.e., transitioned from
+ * a low state (false) to a high state (true).
+ */
+uint64_t qtest_get_irq_raised_counter(QTestState *s, int num);
+
+/**
+ * qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter:
+ * @s: #QTestState instance to operate on.
+ * @num: Interrupt to observe.
+ *
+ * This function can be used in conjunction with the
+ * qtest_get_irq_raised_counter() to check if one or more pulses where
+ * generated on the observed interrupt.
+ *
+ * Returns: The number of times IRQ @num was lowered, i.e., transitioned from
+ * a high state (true) to a low state (false).
+ */
+uint64_t qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter(QTestState *s, int num);
+
 /**
  * qtest_irq_intercept_in:
  * @s: #QTestState instance to operate on.
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2] test/qtest: Add API functions to capture IRQ toggling
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 9 months ago
On 14/11/23 00:01, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Currently, the QTest API does not provide a function to capture when an
> IRQ line is raised or lowered, although the QTest Protocol already
> reports such IRQ transitions. As a consequence, it is also not possible
> to capture when an IRQ line is toggled. Functions like qtest_get_irq()
> only read the current state of the intercepted IRQ lines, which is
> already high (or low) when the function is called if the IRQ line is
> toggled. Therefore, these functions miss the IRQ line state transitions.
> 
> This commit introduces two new API functions:
> qtest_get_irq_raised_counter() and qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter().
> These functions allow capturing the number of times an observed IRQ line
> transitioned from low to high state or from high to low state,
> respectively.
> 
> When used together, these new API functions then allow checking if one
> or more pulses were generated (indicating if the IRQ line was toggled).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   tests/qtest/libqtest.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

Sorry I totally forgot this patch :/

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>


Re: [PATCH v2] test/qtest: Add API functions to capture IRQ toggling
Posted by Thomas Huth 1 year ago
On 14/11/2023 00.01, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Currently, the QTest API does not provide a function to capture when an
> IRQ line is raised or lowered, although the QTest Protocol already
> reports such IRQ transitions. As a consequence, it is also not possible
> to capture when an IRQ line is toggled. Functions like qtest_get_irq()
> only read the current state of the intercepted IRQ lines, which is
> already high (or low) when the function is called if the IRQ line is
> toggled. Therefore, these functions miss the IRQ line state transitions.
> 
> This commit introduces two new API functions:
> qtest_get_irq_raised_counter() and qtest_get_irq_lowered_counter().
> These functions allow capturing the number of times an observed IRQ line
> transitioned from low to high state or from high to low state,
> respectively.
> 
> When used together, these new API functions then allow checking if one
> or more pulses were generated (indicating if the IRQ line was toggled).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   tests/qtest/libqtest.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>