[PATCH] hw/arm/virt: fix GIC maintenance IRQ registration

Jean-Philippe Brucker posted 1 patch 2 years ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20231110090557.3219206-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Maintainers: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
hw/arm/virt.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] hw/arm/virt: fix GIC maintenance IRQ registration
Posted by Jean-Philippe Brucker 2 years ago
Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:

[    0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9

That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID but missed a case
where the maintenance IRQ is actually referred by its PPI index. Just
like commit fa68ecb330db ("hw/arm/virt: fix PMU IRQ registration"), use
INITID_TO_PPI(). A search of "GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI" indicates that there
shouldn't be more similar issues.

Fixes: 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
---
 hw/arm/virt.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index 783d71a1b3..f5e685b060 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -591,7 +591,8 @@ static void fdt_add_gic_node(VirtMachineState *vms)
 
         if (vms->virt) {
             qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(ms->fdt, nodename, "interrupts",
-                                   GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI, ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ,
+                                   GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI,
+                                   INTID_TO_PPI(ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ),
                                    GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_LEVEL_HI);
         }
     } else {
@@ -615,7 +616,8 @@ static void fdt_add_gic_node(VirtMachineState *vms)
                                          2, vms->memmap[VIRT_GIC_VCPU].base,
                                          2, vms->memmap[VIRT_GIC_VCPU].size);
             qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(ms->fdt, nodename, "interrupts",
-                                   GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI, ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ,
+                                   GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI,
+                                   INTID_TO_PPI(ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ),
                                    GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_LEVEL_HI);
         }
     }
-- 
2.42.0
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: fix GIC maintenance IRQ registration
Posted by Peter Maydell 2 years ago
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
>
> [    0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9
>
> That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID but missed a case
> where the maintenance IRQ is actually referred by its PPI index. Just
> like commit fa68ecb330db ("hw/arm/virt: fix PMU IRQ registration"), use
> INITID_TO_PPI(). A search of "GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI" indicates that there
> shouldn't be more similar issues.
>
> Fixes: 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic")
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>

Isn't this already fixed by commit fa68ecb330dbd ?

thanks
-- PMM
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: fix GIC maintenance IRQ registration
Posted by Jean-Philippe Brucker 2 years ago
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:19:30AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> > GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
> >
> > [    0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9
> >
> > That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID but missed a case
> > where the maintenance IRQ is actually referred by its PPI index. Just
> > like commit fa68ecb330db ("hw/arm/virt: fix PMU IRQ registration"), use
> > INITID_TO_PPI(). A search of "GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI" indicates that there
> > shouldn't be more similar issues.
> >
> > Fixes: 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic")
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> 
> Isn't this already fixed by commit fa68ecb330dbd ?

No, that commit fixed the PMU interrupt (I copied most of its commit
message and referenced it), but the GIC maintenance interrupt still needed
to be fixed.

Thanks,
Jean
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: fix GIC maintenance IRQ registration
Posted by Peter Maydell 2 years ago
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 11:45, Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:19:30AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:07, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> > <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Since commit 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic"),
> > > GIC maintenance IRQ registration fails on arm64:
> > >
> > > [    0.979743] kvm [1]: Cannot register interrupt 9
> > >
> > > That commit re-defined VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ to be a INTID but missed a case
> > > where the maintenance IRQ is actually referred by its PPI index. Just
> > > like commit fa68ecb330db ("hw/arm/virt: fix PMU IRQ registration"), use
> > > INITID_TO_PPI(). A search of "GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI" indicates that there
> > > shouldn't be more similar issues.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9036e917f8 ("{include/}hw/arm: refactor virt PPI logic")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> >
> > Isn't this already fixed by commit fa68ecb330dbd ?
>
> No, that commit fixed the PMU interrupt (I copied most of its commit
> message and referenced it), but the GIC maintenance interrupt still needed
> to be fixed.

Ah, yes, I see now. Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.

-- PMM