[PATCH v3 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representative and get DC extent list mailbox support

nifan.cxl@gmail.com posted 9 patches 1 year ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representative and get DC extent list mailbox support
Posted by nifan.cxl@gmail.com 1 year ago
From: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>

Add dynamic capacity extent list representative to the definition of
CXLType3Dev and add get DC extent list mailbox command per
CXL.spec.3.0:.8.2.9.8.9.2.

Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
---
 hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/mem/cxl_type3.c          |  1 +
 include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 23 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
index 1f512b3e6b..56f4aa237a 100644
--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum {
         #define CLEAR_POISON           0x2
     DCD_CONFIG  = 0x48,
         #define GET_DC_CONFIG          0x0
+        #define GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST   0x1
     PHYSICAL_SWITCH = 0x51,
         #define IDENTIFY_SWITCH_DEVICE      0x0
         #define GET_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATE     0x1
@@ -1286,6 +1287,75 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
     return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
 }
 
+/*
+ * CXL r3.0 section 8.2.9.8.9.2:
+ * Get Dynamic Capacity Extent List (Opcode 4810h)
+ */
+static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
+                                               uint8_t *payload_in,
+                                               size_t len_in,
+                                               uint8_t *payload_out,
+                                               size_t *len_out,
+                                               CXLCCI *cci)
+{
+    CXLType3Dev *ct3d = CXL_TYPE3(cci->d);
+    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl {
+        uint32_t extent_cnt;
+        uint32_t start_extent_id;
+    } QEMU_PACKED;
+
+    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl {
+        uint32_t count;
+        uint32_t total_extents;
+        uint32_t generation_num;
+        uint8_t rsvd[4];
+        CXLDCExtentRaw records[];
+    } QEMU_PACKED;
+
+    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl *in = (void *)payload_in;
+    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl *out = (void *)payload_out;
+    uint16_t record_count = 0, i = 0, record_done = 0;
+    CXLDCDExtentList *extent_list = &ct3d->dc.extents;
+    CXLDCDExtent *ent;
+    uint16_t out_pl_len;
+    uint32_t start_extent_id = in->start_extent_id;
+
+    if (start_extent_id > ct3d->dc.total_extent_count) {
+        return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
+    }
+
+    record_count = MIN(in->extent_cnt,
+                       ct3d->dc.total_extent_count - start_extent_id);
+
+    out_pl_len = sizeof(*out) + record_count * sizeof(out->records[0]);
+    /* May need more processing here in the future */
+    assert(out_pl_len <= CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE);
+
+    memset(out, 0, out_pl_len);
+    stl_le_p(&out->count, record_count);
+    stl_le_p(&out->total_extents, ct3d->dc.total_extent_count);
+    stl_le_p(&out->generation_num, ct3d->dc.ext_list_gen_seq);
+
+    if (record_count > 0) {
+        QTAILQ_FOREACH(ent, extent_list, node) {
+            if (i++ < start_extent_id) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].start_dpa, ent->start_dpa);
+            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].len, ent->len);
+            memcpy(&out->records[record_done].tag, ent->tag, 0x10);
+            stw_le_p(&out->records[record_done].shared_seq, ent->shared_seq);
+            record_done++;
+            if (record_done == record_count) {
+                break;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    *len_out = out_pl_len;
+    return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
+}
+
 #define IMMEDIATE_CONFIG_CHANGE (1 << 1)
 #define IMMEDIATE_DATA_CHANGE (1 << 2)
 #define IMMEDIATE_POLICY_CHANGE (1 << 3)
@@ -1333,6 +1403,9 @@ static const struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {
 static const struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_dcd[256][256] = {
     [DCD_CONFIG][GET_DC_CONFIG] = { "DCD_GET_DC_CONFIG",
         cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config, 2, 0 },
+    [DCD_CONFIG][GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST] = {
+        "DCD_GET_DYNAMIC_CAPACITY_EXTENT_LIST", cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list,
+        8, 0 },
 };
 
 static const struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_sw[256][256] = {
diff --git a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
index 152a51306d..c9d792a725 100644
--- a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
+++ b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
@@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ static int cxl_create_dc_regions(CXLType3Dev *ct3d)
 
         region_base += region->len;
     }
+    QTAILQ_INIT(&ct3d->dc.extents);
 
     return 0;
 }
diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
index 3dc6928bc5..5738c6f434 100644
--- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
+++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
@@ -420,6 +420,25 @@ typedef QLIST_HEAD(, CXLPoison) CXLPoisonList;
 
 #define DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM 8
 
+typedef struct CXLDCDExtentRaw {
+    uint64_t start_dpa;
+    uint64_t len;
+    uint8_t tag[0x10];
+    uint16_t shared_seq;
+    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
+} QEMU_PACKED CXLDCExtentRaw;
+
+typedef struct CXLDCDExtent {
+    uint64_t start_dpa;
+    uint64_t len;
+    uint8_t tag[0x10];
+    uint16_t shared_seq;
+    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
+
+    QTAILQ_ENTRY(CXLDCDExtent) node;
+} CXLDCDExtent;
+typedef QTAILQ_HEAD(, CXLDCDExtent) CXLDCDExtentList;
+
 typedef struct CXLDCDRegion {
     uint64_t base;
     uint64_t decode_len; /* aligned to 256*MiB */
@@ -470,6 +489,10 @@ struct CXLType3Dev {
         HostMemoryBackend *host_dc;
         AddressSpace host_dc_as;
         uint64_t total_capacity; /* 256M aligned */
+        CXLDCDExtentList extents;
+
+        uint32_t total_extent_count;
+        uint32_t ext_list_gen_seq;
 
         uint8_t num_regions; /* 0-8 regions */
         CXLDCDRegion regions[DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM];
-- 
2.42.0
Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representative and get DC extent list mailbox support
Posted by Jonathan Cameron via 10 months, 1 week ago
On Tue,  7 Nov 2023 10:07:10 -0800
nifan.cxl@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> 
> Add dynamic capacity extent list representative to the definition of
> CXLType3Dev and add get DC extent list mailbox command per
> CXL.spec.3.0:.8.2.9.8.9.2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
A few minor comments inline.

J
> ---
>  hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/mem/cxl_type3.c          |  1 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 23 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> index 1f512b3e6b..56f4aa237a 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum {
>          #define CLEAR_POISON           0x2
>      DCD_CONFIG  = 0x48,
>          #define GET_DC_CONFIG          0x0
> +        #define GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST   0x1
>      PHYSICAL_SWITCH = 0x51,
>          #define IDENTIFY_SWITCH_DEVICE      0x0
>          #define GET_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATE     0x1
> @@ -1286,6 +1287,75 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>      return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * CXL r3.0 section 8.2.9.8.9.2:
> + * Get Dynamic Capacity Extent List (Opcode 4810h)

4801h

> + */
> +static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> +                                               uint8_t *payload_in,
> +                                               size_t len_in,
> +                                               uint8_t *payload_out,
> +                                               size_t *len_out,
> +                                               CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> +    CXLType3Dev *ct3d = CXL_TYPE3(cci->d);
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl {
> +        uint32_t extent_cnt;
> +        uint32_t start_extent_id;
> +    } QEMU_PACKED;
> +
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl {
> +        uint32_t count;
> +        uint32_t total_extents;
> +        uint32_t generation_num;
> +        uint8_t rsvd[4];
> +        CXLDCExtentRaw records[];
> +    } QEMU_PACKED;
> +
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl *in = (void *)payload_in;
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl *out = (void *)payload_out;
> +    uint16_t record_count = 0, i = 0, record_done = 0;
> +    CXLDCDExtentList *extent_list = &ct3d->dc.extents;
> +    CXLDCDExtent *ent;
> +    uint16_t out_pl_len;
> +    uint32_t start_extent_id = in->start_extent_id;
> +
> +    if (start_extent_id > ct3d->dc.total_extent_count) {
> +        return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> +    }
> +
> +    record_count = MIN(in->extent_cnt,
> +                       ct3d->dc.total_extent_count - start_extent_id);
> +
> +    out_pl_len = sizeof(*out) + record_count * sizeof(out->records[0]);
> +    /* May need more processing here in the future */

Not sure what this comment is referring to... I'd be tempted to just
remove it.

> +    assert(out_pl_len <= CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE);
> +
> +    memset(out, 0, out_pl_len);

As before. It should be already zeroed.

> +    stl_le_p(&out->count, record_count);
> +    stl_le_p(&out->total_extents, ct3d->dc.total_extent_count);
> +    stl_le_p(&out->generation_num, ct3d->dc.ext_list_gen_seq);
> +
> +    if (record_count > 0) {
> +        QTAILQ_FOREACH(ent, extent_list, node) {
> +            if (i++ < start_extent_id) {
> +                continue;
> +            }
> +            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].start_dpa, ent->start_dpa);
> +            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].len, ent->len);
> +            memcpy(&out->records[record_done].tag, ent->tag, 0x10);
> +            stw_le_p(&out->records[record_done].shared_seq, ent->shared_seq);
> +            record_done++;
> +            if (record_done == record_count) {
> +                break;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    *len_out = out_pl_len;
> +    return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +



> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index 3dc6928bc5..5738c6f434 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -420,6 +420,25 @@ typedef QLIST_HEAD(, CXLPoison) CXLPoisonList;
>  
>  #define DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM 8
>  
> +typedef struct CXLDCDExtentRaw {
> +    uint64_t start_dpa;
> +    uint64_t len;
> +    uint8_t tag[0x10];
> +    uint16_t shared_seq;
> +    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
> +} QEMU_PACKED CXLDCExtentRaw;
Naming mismatch.

> +
> +typedef struct CXLDCDExtent {
> +    uint64_t start_dpa;
> +    uint64_t len;
> +    uint8_t tag[0x10];
> +    uint16_t shared_seq;
> +    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
> +
> +    QTAILQ_ENTRY(CXLDCDExtent) node;
> +} CXLDCDExtent;

DCD or DC?  I don't really care but inconsistent currently.

> +typedef QTAILQ_HEAD(, CXLDCDExtent) CXLDCDExtentList;
> +
>  typedef struct CXLDCDRegion {
>      uint64_t base;
>      uint64_t decode_len; /* aligned to 256*MiB */
> @@ -470,6 +489,10 @@ struct CXLType3Dev {
>          HostMemoryBackend *host_dc;
>          AddressSpace host_dc_as;
>          uint64_t total_capacity; /* 256M aligned */
> +        CXLDCDExtentList extents;
> +
> +        uint32_t total_extent_count;
> +        uint32_t ext_list_gen_seq;
>  
>          uint8_t num_regions; /* 0-8 regions */
>          CXLDCDRegion regions[DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM];