On 07/11/2023 13.12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/11/23 11:44, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 06/11/2023 12.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> In order to restrict CPUS390XState declaration to "cpu.h" (both
>>> target-specific):
>>> - have the following prototypes take a S390CPU* instead:
>>> . css_do_sic()
>>> . sclp_service_call()
>>> . sclp_service_call_protected()
>>> - restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG
>>>
>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4):
>>> hw/s390x/css: Have css_do_sic() take S390CPU instead of CPUS390XState
>>> hw/s390x/sclp: Have sclp_service_call[_protected]() take S390CPU*
>>> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG
>>> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h'
>>
>> Patches look reasonable. Thanks, queued them now!
>
> Thanks, since I wasn't sure the series would be reviewed in time for
> soft freeze, I didn't mention it would be more convenient for me to
> take it via my hw-misc tree. Since you kindly reviewed it, I'll take
> it :) Thanks!
All right, I'll drop them from my queue again then.
Thomas