[PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy posted 12 patches 1 year, 1 month ago
Maintainers: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 1 year, 1 month ago
This @size parameter often comes from fd. We'd better check it before
doing read and allocation.

Chose 1G as high enough empiric bound.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 hw/core/loader.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
index 4dd5a71fb7..4b67543046 100644
--- a/hw/core/loader.c
+++ b/hw/core/loader.c
@@ -281,11 +281,26 @@ ssize_t load_aout(const char *filename, hwaddr addr, int max_sz,
 
 /* ELF loader */
 
+#define ELF_LOAD_MAX (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
+
 static void *load_at(int fd, off_t offset, size_t size)
 {
     void *ptr;
-    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0)
+
+    /*
+     * We often come here with @size, which was previously read from file
+     * descriptor too. That's not good to read and allocate for unchecked
+     * number of bytes. Coverity also doesn't like it and generate problems.
+     * So, let's limit all load_at() calls to ELF_LOAD_MAX at least.
+     */
+    if (size > ELF_LOAD_MAX) {
         return NULL;
+    }
+
+    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+
     ptr = g_malloc(size);
     if (read(fd, ptr, size) != size) {
         g_free(ptr);
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size
Posted by Peter Maydell 1 year, 1 month ago
On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 20:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
<vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
> This @size parameter often comes from fd. We'd better check it before
> doing read and allocation.
>
> Chose 1G as high enough empiric bound.

Empirical for who?

> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
> ---
>  hw/core/loader.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
> index 4dd5a71fb7..4b67543046 100644
> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
> @@ -281,11 +281,26 @@ ssize_t load_aout(const char *filename, hwaddr addr, int max_sz,
>
>  /* ELF loader */
>
> +#define ELF_LOAD_MAX (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
> +
>  static void *load_at(int fd, off_t offset, size_t size)
>  {
>      void *ptr;
> -    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0)
> +
> +    /*
> +     * We often come here with @size, which was previously read from file
> +     * descriptor too. That's not good to read and allocate for unchecked
> +     * number of bytes. Coverity also doesn't like it and generate problems.
> +     * So, let's limit all load_at() calls to ELF_LOAD_MAX at least.
> +     */
> +    if (size > ELF_LOAD_MAX) {
>          return NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +
>      ptr = g_malloc(size);
>      if (read(fd, ptr, size) != size) {
>          g_free(ptr);

This doesn't really help anything:
 (1) if the value is really big, it doesn't cause any terrible
consequences -- QEMU will just exit because the allocation
fails, which is fine because this will be at QEMU startup
and only happens if the user running QEMU gives us a silly file
 (2) we do a lot of other "allocate and abort on failure"
elsewhere in the ELF loader, for instance the allocations of
the symbol table and relocs in the load_symbols and
elf_reloc functions, and then on a bigger scale when we
work with the actual data in the ELF file

thanks
-- PMM
Re: [PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 1 year, 1 month ago
On 26.09.23 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 20:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>
>> This @size parameter often comes from fd. We'd better check it before
>> doing read and allocation.
>>
>> Chose 1G as high enough empiric bound.
> 
> Empirical for who?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>> ---
>>   hw/core/loader.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
>> index 4dd5a71fb7..4b67543046 100644
>> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
>> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
>> @@ -281,11 +281,26 @@ ssize_t load_aout(const char *filename, hwaddr addr, int max_sz,
>>
>>   /* ELF loader */
>>
>> +#define ELF_LOAD_MAX (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
>> +
>>   static void *load_at(int fd, off_t offset, size_t size)
>>   {
>>       void *ptr;
>> -    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0)
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * We often come here with @size, which was previously read from file
>> +     * descriptor too. That's not good to read and allocate for unchecked
>> +     * number of bytes. Coverity also doesn't like it and generate problems.
>> +     * So, let's limit all load_at() calls to ELF_LOAD_MAX at least.
>> +     */
>> +    if (size > ELF_LOAD_MAX) {
>>           return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       ptr = g_malloc(size);
>>       if (read(fd, ptr, size) != size) {
>>           g_free(ptr);
> 
> This doesn't really help anything:
>   (1) if the value is really big, it doesn't cause any terrible
> consequences -- QEMU will just exit because the allocation
> fails, which is fine because this will be at QEMU startup
> and only happens if the user running QEMU gives us a silly file
>   (2) we do a lot of other "allocate and abort on failure"
> elsewhere in the ELF loader, for instance the allocations of
> the symbol table and relocs in the load_symbols and
> elf_reloc functions, and then on a bigger scale when we
> work with the actual data in the ELF file

Reasonable..

Don't you have an idea, how to somehow mark the value "trusted" for Coverity?

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir
Re: [PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size
Posted by Peter Maydell 1 year, 1 month ago
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 11:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
<vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
> On 26.09.23 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 20:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >> This @size parameter often comes from fd. We'd better check it before
> >> doing read and allocation.
> >>
> >> Chose 1G as high enough empiric bound.
> >
> > Empirical for who?
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
> >> ---
> >>   hw/core/loader.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
> >> index 4dd5a71fb7..4b67543046 100644
> >> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
> >> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
> >> @@ -281,11 +281,26 @@ ssize_t load_aout(const char *filename, hwaddr addr, int max_sz,
> >>
> >>   /* ELF loader */
> >>
> >> +#define ELF_LOAD_MAX (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
> >> +
> >>   static void *load_at(int fd, off_t offset, size_t size)
> >>   {
> >>       void *ptr;
> >> -    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0)
> >> +
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * We often come here with @size, which was previously read from file
> >> +     * descriptor too. That's not good to read and allocate for unchecked
> >> +     * number of bytes. Coverity also doesn't like it and generate problems.
> >> +     * So, let's limit all load_at() calls to ELF_LOAD_MAX at least.
> >> +     */
> >> +    if (size > ELF_LOAD_MAX) {
> >>           return NULL;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> >> +        return NULL;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >>       ptr = g_malloc(size);
> >>       if (read(fd, ptr, size) != size) {
> >>           g_free(ptr);
> >
> > This doesn't really help anything:
> >   (1) if the value is really big, it doesn't cause any terrible
> > consequences -- QEMU will just exit because the allocation
> > fails, which is fine because this will be at QEMU startup
> > and only happens if the user running QEMU gives us a silly file
> >   (2) we do a lot of other "allocate and abort on failure"
> > elsewhere in the ELF loader, for instance the allocations of
> > the symbol table and relocs in the load_symbols and
> > elf_reloc functions, and then on a bigger scale when we
> > work with the actual data in the ELF file
>
> Reasonable..
>
> Don't you have an idea, how to somehow mark the value "trusted" for Coverity?

In the web UI, I just mark it "false positive" in the dropdown, and
move on. Coverity has an absolute ton of false positives, and you
really can't work with it unless you have a workflow for ignoring them.

thanks
-- PMM
Re: [PATCH 01/12] hw/core/loader: load_at(): check size
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 1 year, 1 month ago
On 26.09.23 13:54, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 11:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>
>> On 26.09.23 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 20:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>> <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This @size parameter often comes from fd. We'd better check it before
>>>> doing read and allocation.
>>>>
>>>> Chose 1G as high enough empiric bound.
>>>
>>> Empirical for who?
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>>>> ---
>>>>    hw/core/loader.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>>>    1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
>>>> index 4dd5a71fb7..4b67543046 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
>>>> @@ -281,11 +281,26 @@ ssize_t load_aout(const char *filename, hwaddr addr, int max_sz,
>>>>
>>>>    /* ELF loader */
>>>>
>>>> +#define ELF_LOAD_MAX (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
>>>> +
>>>>    static void *load_at(int fd, off_t offset, size_t size)
>>>>    {
>>>>        void *ptr;
>>>> -    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0)
>>>> +
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * We often come here with @size, which was previously read from file
>>>> +     * descriptor too. That's not good to read and allocate for unchecked
>>>> +     * number of bytes. Coverity also doesn't like it and generate problems.
>>>> +     * So, let's limit all load_at() calls to ELF_LOAD_MAX at least.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    if (size > ELF_LOAD_MAX) {
>>>>            return NULL;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
>>>> +        return NULL;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>>        ptr = g_malloc(size);
>>>>        if (read(fd, ptr, size) != size) {
>>>>            g_free(ptr);
>>>
>>> This doesn't really help anything:
>>>    (1) if the value is really big, it doesn't cause any terrible
>>> consequences -- QEMU will just exit because the allocation
>>> fails, which is fine because this will be at QEMU startup
>>> and only happens if the user running QEMU gives us a silly file
>>>    (2) we do a lot of other "allocate and abort on failure"
>>> elsewhere in the ELF loader, for instance the allocations of
>>> the symbol table and relocs in the load_symbols and
>>> elf_reloc functions, and then on a bigger scale when we
>>> work with the actual data in the ELF file
>>
>> Reasonable..
>>
>> Don't you have an idea, how to somehow mark the value "trusted" for Coverity?
> 
> In the web UI, I just mark it "false positive" in the dropdown, and
> move on. Coverity has an absolute ton of false positives, and you
> really can't work with it unless you have a workflow for ignoring them.
> 

Yes, I have the possibility to mark "false positives", but tried to fix some things in the code which seemed reasonable to me. Thanks a lot for reviewing and explaining!

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir