hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
I had another instance of this in a series I'll post later today.
Cleaned that up the same way.
hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
index 517f06d869..bd68328032 100644
--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
@@ -283,13 +283,13 @@ static void memdev_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
{
- uint64_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
+ uint64_t *cap_h = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
const int cap_count = 3;
/* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
- ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
- ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
- ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
+ ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
+ ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
+ ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE_STATUS, 1, 2);
device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
--
2.39.2
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> writes: > Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Queued, thanks!
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>
> I had another instance of this in a series I'll post later today.
> Cleaned that up the same way.
>
> hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index 517f06d869..bd68328032 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -283,13 +283,13 @@ static void memdev_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
>
> void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> {
> - uint64_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> + uint64_t *cap_h = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> const int cap_count = 3;
>
> /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
>
> cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE_STATUS, 1, 2);
> device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
pls merge with the rest of local shadowing things.
> I had another instance of this in a series I'll post later today.
> Cleaned that up the same way.
>
> hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index 517f06d869..bd68328032 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -283,13 +283,13 @@ static void memdev_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
>
> void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> {
> - uint64_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> + uint64_t *cap_h = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> const int cap_count = 3;
>
> /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
>
> cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE_STATUS, 1, 2);
> device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> --
> 2.39.2
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h.
The change looks good to me. Just one minor thing. why "version" get
involved here?
Fan
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>
> I had another instance of this in a series I'll post later today.
> Cleaned that up the same way.
>
> hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index 517f06d869..bd68328032 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -283,13 +283,13 @@ static void memdev_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
>
> void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> {
> - uint64_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> + uint64_t *cap_h = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> const int cap_count = 3;
>
> /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
>
> cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE_STATUS, 1, 2);
> device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 19:13:35 +0000
Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h.
> The change looks good to me. Just one minor thing. why "version" get
> involved here?
>
Used in the sense of two copies of something with slightly differences
given if it were straight code without a macro, we'd have just
have used the copy being changed here for all of the calls.
With hindsight, not the best word to choose given the many other meanings!
Jonathan
> Fan
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I had another instance of this in a series I'll post later today.
> > Cleaned that up the same way.
> >
> > hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > index 517f06d869..bd68328032 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > @@ -283,13 +283,13 @@ static void memdev_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
> >
> > void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> > {
> > - uint64_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> > + uint64_t *cap_h = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state64;
> > const int cap_count = 3;
> >
> > /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> > - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> > - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> > - ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP64(cap_h, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> >
> > cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE_STATUS, 1, 2);
> > device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> writes: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 19:13:35 +0000 > Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> >> > Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h. >> The change looks good to me. Just one minor thing. why "version" get >> involved here? >> > > Used in the sense of two copies of something with slightly differences > given if it were straight code without a macro, we'd have just > have used the copy being changed here for all of the calls. > With hindsight, not the best word to choose given the many other meanings! Fan, good enough to get your R-by?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 19:13:35 +0000 > > Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >> > >> > Rename the version not burried in the macro to cap_h. > >> The change looks good to me. Just one minor thing. why "version" get > >> involved here? > >> > > > > Used in the sense of two copies of something with slightly differences > > given if it were straight code without a macro, we'd have just > > have used the copy being changed here for all of the calls. > > With hindsight, not the best word to choose given the many other meanings! > > Fan, good enough to get your R-by? > Yes. Fan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.