In order to avoid a forward-declaration for "vhost_user_write_sync" in a
subsequent patch, hoist "vhost_user_write_sync" ->
"vhost_user_get_features" -> "vhost_user_get_u64" just above
"vhost_set_vring".
This is purely code movement -- no observable change.
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> (supporter:vhost)
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: German Maglione <gmaglione@redhat.com>
Cc: Liu Jiang <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v2:
- pick up R-b from Stefano
- rename "vhost_user_write_msg" to "vhost_user_write_sync" (in code and
commit message) [Stefano]
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 170 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index 4129ba72e408..c79b6f77cdca 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -1083,6 +1083,91 @@ static int vhost_user_set_vring_endian(struct vhost_dev *dev,
return vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
}
+static int vhost_user_get_u64(struct vhost_dev *dev, int request, uint64_t *u64)
+{
+ int ret;
+ VhostUserMsg msg = {
+ .hdr.request = request,
+ .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
+ };
+
+ if (vhost_user_per_device_request(request) && dev->vq_index != 0) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ ret = vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = vhost_user_read(dev, &msg);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (msg.hdr.request != request) {
+ error_report("Received unexpected msg type. Expected %d received %d",
+ request, msg.hdr.request);
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ if (msg.hdr.size != sizeof(msg.payload.u64)) {
+ error_report("Received bad msg size.");
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ *u64 = msg.payload.u64;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int vhost_user_get_features(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t *features)
+{
+ if (vhost_user_get_u64(dev, VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES, features) < 0) {
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Note: "msg->hdr.flags" may be modified. */
+static int vhost_user_write_sync(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg,
+ bool wait_for_reply)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (wait_for_reply) {
+ bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
+ VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
+ if (reply_supported) {
+ msg->hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = vhost_user_write(dev, msg, NULL, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (wait_for_reply) {
+ uint64_t dummy;
+
+ if (msg->hdr.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK) {
+ return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We need to wait for a reply but the backend does not
+ * support replies for the command we just sent.
+ * Send VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES which makes all backends
+ * send a reply.
+ */
+ return vhost_user_get_features(dev, &dummy);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *dev,
unsigned long int request,
struct vhost_vring_state *ring)
@@ -1255,91 +1340,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_vring_err(struct vhost_dev *dev,
return vhost_set_vring_file(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ERR, file);
}
-static int vhost_user_get_u64(struct vhost_dev *dev, int request, uint64_t *u64)
-{
- int ret;
- VhostUserMsg msg = {
- .hdr.request = request,
- .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
- };
-
- if (vhost_user_per_device_request(request) && dev->vq_index != 0) {
- return 0;
- }
-
- ret = vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
- if (ret < 0) {
- return ret;
- }
-
- ret = vhost_user_read(dev, &msg);
- if (ret < 0) {
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (msg.hdr.request != request) {
- error_report("Received unexpected msg type. Expected %d received %d",
- request, msg.hdr.request);
- return -EPROTO;
- }
-
- if (msg.hdr.size != sizeof(msg.payload.u64)) {
- error_report("Received bad msg size.");
- return -EPROTO;
- }
-
- *u64 = msg.payload.u64;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int vhost_user_get_features(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t *features)
-{
- if (vhost_user_get_u64(dev, VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES, features) < 0) {
- return -EPROTO;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* Note: "msg->hdr.flags" may be modified. */
-static int vhost_user_write_sync(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg,
- bool wait_for_reply)
-{
- int ret;
-
- if (wait_for_reply) {
- bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
- VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
- if (reply_supported) {
- msg->hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
- }
- }
-
- ret = vhost_user_write(dev, msg, NULL, 0);
- if (ret < 0) {
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (wait_for_reply) {
- uint64_t dummy;
-
- if (msg->hdr.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK) {
- return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
- }
-
- /*
- * We need to wait for a reply but the backend does not
- * support replies for the command we just sent.
- * Send VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES which makes all backends
- * send a reply.
- */
- return vhost_user_get_features(dev, &dummy);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int vhost_user_set_vring_addr(struct vhost_dev *dev,
struct vhost_vring_addr *addr)
{
On 8/30/23 15:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> In order to avoid a forward-declaration for "vhost_user_write_sync" in a
> subsequent patch, hoist "vhost_user_write_sync" ->
> "vhost_user_get_features" -> "vhost_user_get_u64" just above
> "vhost_set_vring".
>
> This is purely code movement -- no observable change.
>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> (supporter:vhost)
> Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Cc: German Maglione <gmaglione@redhat.com>
> Cc: Liu Jiang <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
>
> - pick up R-b from Stefano
>
> - rename "vhost_user_write_msg" to "vhost_user_write_sync" (in code and
> commit message) [Stefano]
>
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 170 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
Phil reviewed v1:
http://mid.mail-archive.com/98150923-39ef-7581-6144-8d0ad8d4dd52@linaro.org
and I would've kept his R-b (similar to Stefano's) across the
vhost_user_write_msg->vhost_user_write_sync rename in v2; so I'm copying
it here:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Hope that's OK.
Laszlo
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index 4129ba72e408..c79b6f77cdca 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -1083,6 +1083,91 @@ static int vhost_user_set_vring_endian(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> return vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> +static int vhost_user_get_u64(struct vhost_dev *dev, int request, uint64_t *u64)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + VhostUserMsg msg = {
> + .hdr.request = request,
> + .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
> + };
> +
> + if (vhost_user_per_device_request(request) && dev->vq_index != 0) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vhost_user_read(dev, &msg);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg.hdr.request != request) {
> + error_report("Received unexpected msg type. Expected %d received %d",
> + request, msg.hdr.request);
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg.hdr.size != sizeof(msg.payload.u64)) {
> + error_report("Received bad msg size.");
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + *u64 = msg.payload.u64;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_user_get_features(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t *features)
> +{
> + if (vhost_user_get_u64(dev, VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES, features) < 0) {
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Note: "msg->hdr.flags" may be modified. */
> +static int vhost_user_write_sync(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg,
> + bool wait_for_reply)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (wait_for_reply) {
> + bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
> + if (reply_supported) {
> + msg->hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = vhost_user_write(dev, msg, NULL, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (wait_for_reply) {
> + uint64_t dummy;
> +
> + if (msg->hdr.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK) {
> + return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to wait for a reply but the backend does not
> + * support replies for the command we just sent.
> + * Send VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES which makes all backends
> + * send a reply.
> + */
> + return vhost_user_get_features(dev, &dummy);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> unsigned long int request,
> struct vhost_vring_state *ring)
> @@ -1255,91 +1340,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_vring_err(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> return vhost_set_vring_file(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ERR, file);
> }
>
> -static int vhost_user_get_u64(struct vhost_dev *dev, int request, uint64_t *u64)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - VhostUserMsg msg = {
> - .hdr.request = request,
> - .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
> - };
> -
> - if (vhost_user_per_device_request(request) && dev->vq_index != 0) {
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - ret = vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - ret = vhost_user_read(dev, &msg);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - if (msg.hdr.request != request) {
> - error_report("Received unexpected msg type. Expected %d received %d",
> - request, msg.hdr.request);
> - return -EPROTO;
> - }
> -
> - if (msg.hdr.size != sizeof(msg.payload.u64)) {
> - error_report("Received bad msg size.");
> - return -EPROTO;
> - }
> -
> - *u64 = msg.payload.u64;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int vhost_user_get_features(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t *features)
> -{
> - if (vhost_user_get_u64(dev, VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES, features) < 0) {
> - return -EPROTO;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* Note: "msg->hdr.flags" may be modified. */
> -static int vhost_user_write_sync(struct vhost_dev *dev, VhostUserMsg *msg,
> - bool wait_for_reply)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - if (wait_for_reply) {
> - bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> - VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK);
> - if (reply_supported) {
> - msg->hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - ret = vhost_user_write(dev, msg, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - if (wait_for_reply) {
> - uint64_t dummy;
> -
> - if (msg->hdr.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK) {
> - return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * We need to wait for a reply but the backend does not
> - * support replies for the command we just sent.
> - * Send VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES which makes all backends
> - * send a reply.
> - */
> - return vhost_user_get_features(dev, &dummy);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int vhost_user_set_vring_addr(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> struct vhost_vring_addr *addr)
> {
>
On 31/8/23 09:20, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 8/30/23 15:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> In order to avoid a forward-declaration for "vhost_user_write_sync" in a >> subsequent patch, hoist "vhost_user_write_sync" -> >> "vhost_user_get_features" -> "vhost_user_get_u64" just above >> "vhost_set_vring". >> >> This is purely code movement -- no observable change. >> >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> (supporter:vhost) >> Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com> >> Cc: German Maglione <gmaglione@redhat.com> >> Cc: Liu Jiang <gerry@linux.alibaba.com> >> Cc: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com> >> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> >> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> >> --- >> >> Notes: >> v2: >> >> - pick up R-b from Stefano >> >> - rename "vhost_user_write_msg" to "vhost_user_write_sync" (in code and >> commit message) [Stefano] >> >> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 170 ++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > Phil reviewed v1: > > http://mid.mail-archive.com/98150923-39ef-7581-6144-8d0ad8d4dd52@linaro.org > > and I would've kept his R-b (similar to Stefano's) across the > vhost_user_write_msg->vhost_user_write_sync rename in v2; so I'm copying > it here: > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > Hope that's OK. Sure! (same for patch 2/7) Thanks :) Phil.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.