This is x86-specific code, so there is no advantage in using
pc_madt_cpu_entry() behind an architecture-agnostic interface.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
---
 hw/i386/acpi-common.h  | 3 +--
 hw/i386/acpi-build.c   | 3 +--
 hw/i386/acpi-common.c  | 5 ++---
 hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 3 +--
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-common.h b/hw/i386/acpi-common.h
index a68825acf5..b3c56ee014 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-common.h
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-common.h
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 #ifndef HW_I386_ACPI_COMMON_H
 #define HW_I386_ACPI_COMMON_H
 
-#include "hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h"
 #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h"
 #include "hw/i386/x86.h"
 
@@ -9,7 +8,7 @@
 #define ACPI_BUILD_IOAPIC_ID 0x0
 
 void acpi_build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
-                     X86MachineState *x86ms, AcpiDeviceIf *adev,
+                     X86MachineState *x86ms,
                      const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index bb12b0ad43..09586b8d9b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -2547,8 +2547,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine)
 
     acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
     acpi_build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, x86ms,
-                    ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id,
-                    x86ms->oem_table_id);
+                    x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_ERST
     {
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
index 8a0932fe84..43dc23f7e0 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
@@ -94,14 +94,13 @@ build_xrupt_override(GArray *entry, uint8_t src, uint32_t gsi, uint16_t flags)
  * 5.2.8 Multiple APIC Description Table
  */
 void acpi_build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
-                     X86MachineState *x86ms, AcpiDeviceIf *adev,
+                     X86MachineState *x86ms,
                      const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id)
 {
     int i;
     bool x2apic_mode = false;
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(x86ms);
     const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(x86ms));
-    AcpiDeviceIfClass *adevc = ACPI_DEVICE_IF_GET_CLASS(adev);
     AcpiTable table = { .sig = "APIC", .rev = 3, .oem_id = oem_id,
                         .oem_table_id = oem_table_id };
 
@@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ void acpi_build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
     build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 1 /* PCAT_COMPAT */, 4); /* Flags */
 
     for (i = 0; i < apic_ids->len; i++) {
-        adevc->madt_cpu(i, apic_ids, table_data, false);
+        pc_madt_cpu_entry(i, apic_ids, table_data, false);
         if (apic_ids->cpus[i].arch_id > 254) {
             x2apic_mode = true;
         }
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c
index a075360d85..fec22d85c1 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c
@@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables,
 
     acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
     acpi_build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, X86_MACHINE(machine),
-                    ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id,
-                    x86ms->oem_table_id);
+                    x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_ERST
     {
-- 
2.42.0

On 28/8/23 09:36, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> This is x86-specific code, so there is no advantage in using
> pc_madt_cpu_entry() behind an architecture-agnostic interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
> ---
>   hw/i386/acpi-common.h  | 3 +--
>   hw/i386/acpi-build.c   | 3 +--
>   hw/i386/acpi-common.c  | 5 ++---
>   hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 3 +--
>   4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>