The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the same name
in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the documentation from
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = {
[FEAT_KVM] = {
.type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD,
.feat_names = {
- "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock",
+ "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2",
"kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm-pv-unhalt",
NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi",
"kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm-asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id",
--
2.39.2
On 24/8/23 15:57, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the same name
> in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the documentation from
> https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html
>
Fixes: 642258c6c7 ("kvm: add kvmclock to its second bit")
?
> Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = {
> [FEAT_KVM] = {
> .type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD,
> .feat_names = {
> - "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock",
> + "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2",
> "kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm-pv-unhalt",
> NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi",
> "kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm-asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id",
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 17:12 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 24/8/23 15:57, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the
> > same name
> > in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the
> > documentation from
> > https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html
> >
>
> Fixes: 642258c6c7 ("kvm: add kvmclock to its second bit")
> ?
>
Right, added that locally. Thanks!
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo
> > feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = {
> > [FEAT_KVM] = {
> > .type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD,
> > .feat_names = {
> > - "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock",
> > + "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2",
> > "kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm-
> > pv-unhalt",
> > NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi",
> > "kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm-
> > asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id",
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.