The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the same name
in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the documentation from
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = {
[FEAT_KVM] = {
.type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD,
.feat_names = {
- "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock",
+ "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2",
"kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm-pv-unhalt",
NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi",
"kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm-asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id",
--
2.39.2
On 24/8/23 15:57, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the same name > in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the documentation from > https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html > Fixes: 642258c6c7 ("kvm: add kvmclock to its second bit") ? > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com> > --- > target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c > index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644 > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c > @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = { > [FEAT_KVM] = { > .type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD, > .feat_names = { > - "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock", > + "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2", > "kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm-pv-unhalt", > NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi", > "kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm-asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id",
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 17:12 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 24/8/23 15:57, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > > The mistake became apparent as there were two features with the > > same name > > in this cpuid leaf. The names are now in line with the > > documentation from > > https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/virt/kvm/x86/cpuid.html > > > > Fixes: 642258c6c7 ("kvm: add kvmclock to its second bit") > ? > Right, added that locally. Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com> > > --- > > target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c > > index 0b74d80371..ceb291f8a8 100644 > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c > > @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ FeatureWordInfo > > feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = { > > [FEAT_KVM] = { > > .type = CPUID_FEATURE_WORD, > > .feat_names = { > > - "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock", > > + "kvmclock", "kvm-nopiodelay", "kvm-mmu", "kvmclock2", > > "kvm-asyncpf", "kvm-steal-time", "kvm-pv-eoi", "kvm- > > pv-unhalt", > > NULL, "kvm-pv-tlb-flush", NULL, "kvm-pv-ipi", > > "kvm-poll-control", "kvm-pv-sched-yield", "kvm- > > asyncpf-int", "kvm-msi-ext-dest-id", >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.