On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:57:52 +0200
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> Doing a break to do another break is just confused. Just call return
> when we know we want to return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> ---
> migration/ram-compress.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram-compress.c b/migration/ram-compress.c
> index 5e1bb82fcd..cf3a6c238d 100644
> --- a/migration/ram-compress.c
> +++ b/migration/ram-compress.c
> @@ -498,14 +498,10 @@ void decompress_data_with_multi_threads(QEMUFile *f, void *host, int len)
> decomp_param[idx].len = len;
> qemu_cond_signal(&decomp_param[idx].cond);
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&decomp_param[idx].mutex);
> - break;
> + return;
> }
> }
> - if (idx < thread_count) {
> - break;
> - } else {
> - qemu_cond_wait(&decomp_done_cond, &decomp_done_lock);
> - }
> + qemu_cond_wait(&decomp_done_cond, &decomp_done_lock);
> }
> }
>