About year ago support for setting platform version for sbsa-ref was
added with "0.0" value.

This patchset bumps it to "0.1" as we export basic GIC information via
DeviceTree to the firmware. TF-A will then take it and provide to EDK2
via Secure Monitor Call (instead of using hardcoded values).

Basic documentation about platform changes added.

Marcin Juszkiewicz (3):
  hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT
  docs: sbsa: correct graphics card name
  docs: sbsa: document platform version changes


-- 
2.40.1

On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 12:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz
<marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> About year ago support for setting platform version for sbsa-ref was
> added with "0.0" value.
>
> This patchset bumps it to "0.1" as we export basic GIC information via
> DeviceTree to the firmware. TF-A will then take it and provide to EDK2
> via Secure Monitor Call (instead of using hardcoded values).
>
> Basic documentation about platform changes added.
>
> Marcin Juszkiewicz (3):
>   hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT
>   docs: sbsa: correct graphics card name
>   docs: sbsa: document platform version changes
>

I've applied the first two patches to target-arm.next;
I had some comments on the third.

thanks
-- PMM

On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 12:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz
<marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> About year ago support for setting platform version for sbsa-ref was
> added with "0.0" value.
>
> This patchset bumps it to "0.1" as we export basic GIC information via
> DeviceTree to the firmware. TF-A will then take it and provide to EDK2
> via Secure Monitor Call (instead of using hardcoded values).
>
> Basic documentation about platform changes added.
>
> Marcin Juszkiewicz (3):
>   hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add GIC node into DT
>   docs: sbsa: correct graphics card name
>   docs: sbsa: document platform version changes

The cover message subject says there should be 4 patches
in this series, but there are only 3 listed here and
only 3 emails arrived on list. Is there a missing patch?

thanks
-- PMM

W dniu 25.05.2023 o 12:08, Peter Maydell pisze:
> The cover message subject says there should be 4 patches
> in this series, but there are only 3 listed here and
> only 3 emails arrived on list. Is there a missing patch?

I am sorry for mess - 4th patch turned out to be WIP one so I removed it.