[PATCH 07/11] hw/virtio/vhost-vsock: Include missing 'virtio/virtio-bus.h' header

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé posted 11 patches 2 years, 8 months ago
Maintainers: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>, "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 07/11] hw/virtio/vhost-vsock: Include missing 'virtio/virtio-bus.h' header
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2 years, 8 months ago
Instead of having "virtio/virtio-bus.h" implicitly included,
explicit it, to avoid when rearranging headers:

  hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c: In function ‘vhost_vsock_common_start’:
  hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c:51:5: error: unknown type name ‘VirtioBusClass’; did you mean ‘VirtioDeviceClass’?
     51 |     VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
        |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |     VirtioDeviceClass
  hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c:51:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS’; did you mean ‘VIRTIO_DEVICE_CLASS’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     51 |     VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
        |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                         VIRTIO_DEVICE_CLASS

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c
index d2b5519d5a..e89af9b329 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_vsock.h"
 #include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h"
 #include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
 #include "qemu/error-report.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
-- 
2.38.1


Re: [PATCH 07/11] hw/virtio/vhost-vsock: Include missing 'virtio/virtio-bus.h' header
Posted by Thomas Huth 2 years, 8 months ago
On 23/05/2023 18.35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Instead of having "virtio/virtio-bus.h" implicitly included,
> explicit it, to avoid when rearranging headers:

s/explicit it/explicitly include it/ ?

With that change:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>


Re: [PATCH 07/11] hw/virtio/vhost-vsock: Include missing 'virtio/virtio-bus.h' header
Posted by Richard Henderson 2 years, 8 months ago
On 5/23/23 09:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Instead of having "virtio/virtio-bus.h" implicitly included,
> explicit it, to avoid when rearranging headers:
> 
>    hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c: In function ‘vhost_vsock_common_start’:
>    hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c:51:5: error: unknown type name ‘VirtioBusClass’; did you mean ‘VirtioDeviceClass’?
>       51 |     VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
>          |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |     VirtioDeviceClass
>    hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c:51:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS’; did you mean ‘VIRTIO_DEVICE_CLASS’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       51 |     VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
>          |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                         VIRTIO_DEVICE_CLASS
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé<philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>   hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~