[PATCH] memory: stricter checks prior to unsetting engaged_in_io

Alexander Bulekov posted 1 patch 11 months, 2 weeks ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
Maintainers: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
softmmu/memory.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] memory: stricter checks prior to unsetting engaged_in_io
Posted by Alexander Bulekov 11 months, 2 weeks ago
engaged_in_io could be unset by an MR with re-entrancy checks disabled.
Ensure that only MRs that can set the engaged_in_io flag can unset it.

Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1563
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
---
 softmmu/memory.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
index b7b3386e9d..26424f1d78 100644
--- a/softmmu/memory.c
+++ b/softmmu/memory.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
     unsigned access_size;
     unsigned i;
     MemTxResult r = MEMTX_OK;
+    bool reentrancy_guard_applied = false;
 
     if (!access_size_min) {
         access_size_min = 1;
@@ -552,6 +553,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
             return MEMTX_ACCESS_ERROR;
         }
         mr->dev->mem_reentrancy_guard.engaged_in_io = true;
+        reentrancy_guard_applied = true;
     }
 
     /* FIXME: support unaligned access? */
@@ -568,7 +570,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
                         access_mask, attrs);
         }
     }
-    if (mr->dev) {
+    if (mr->dev && reentrancy_guard_applied) {
         mr->dev->mem_reentrancy_guard.engaged_in_io = false;
     }
     return r;
-- 
2.39.0
Re: [PATCH] memory: stricter checks prior to unsetting engaged_in_io
Posted by Darren Kenny 11 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tuesday, 2023-05-16 at 04:40:02 -04, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> engaged_in_io could be unset by an MR with re-entrancy checks disabled.
> Ensure that only MRs that can set the engaged_in_io flag can unset it.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1563
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>

Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>

> ---
>  softmmu/memory.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
> index b7b3386e9d..26424f1d78 100644
> --- a/softmmu/memory.c
> +++ b/softmmu/memory.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
>      unsigned access_size;
>      unsigned i;
>      MemTxResult r = MEMTX_OK;
> +    bool reentrancy_guard_applied = false;
>  
>      if (!access_size_min) {
>          access_size_min = 1;
> @@ -552,6 +553,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
>              return MEMTX_ACCESS_ERROR;
>          }
>          mr->dev->mem_reentrancy_guard.engaged_in_io = true;
> +        reentrancy_guard_applied = true;
>      }
>  
>      /* FIXME: support unaligned access? */
> @@ -568,7 +570,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
>                          access_mask, attrs);
>          }
>      }
> -    if (mr->dev) {
> +    if (mr->dev && reentrancy_guard_applied) {
>          mr->dev->mem_reentrancy_guard.engaged_in_io = false;
>      }
>      return r;
> -- 
> 2.39.0