On 5/5/23 14:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 08:13, Richard Henderson
> <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc
>> index 37870c89fc..4dd33c73e8 100644
>> --- a/tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc
>> +++ b/tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc
>> @@ -910,8 +910,12 @@ static TCGLabelQemuLdst *prepare_host_addr(TCGContext *s, TCGReg *pbase,
>> {
>> TCGLabelQemuLdst *ldst = NULL;
>> MemOp opc = get_memop(oi);
>> - unsigned a_bits = get_alignment_bits(opc);
>> - unsigned a_mask = (1u << a_bits) - 1;
>> + MemOp a_bits, atom_a, atom_u;
>> + unsigned a_mask;
>> +
>> + a_bits = atom_and_align_for_opc(s, &atom_a, &atom_u, opc,
>> + MO_ATOM_IFALIGN, false);
>> + a_mask = (1u << a_bits) - 1;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU
>> unsigned s_bits = opc & MO_SIZE;
>
> Same remark as for ppc.
Because the alignment was not required outside of prepare_host_addr.
RISC-V does not have 128-bit memory operations of any kind.
r~