[PATCH 12/19] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA

Juan Quintela posted 19 patches 2 years, 9 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 12/19] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA
Posted by Juan Quintela 2 years, 9 months ago
This could only happen if the source send
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK (i.e. rdma) and destination don't have CONFIG_RDMA.

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
---
 migration/qemu-file.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/qemu-file.c b/migration/qemu-file.c
index 9b5e14a2ef..014db96984 100644
--- a/migration/qemu-file.c
+++ b/migration/qemu-file.c
@@ -322,14 +322,6 @@ void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags, void *data)
         if (ret < 0) {
             qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
         }
-    } else {
-        /*
-         * Hook is a hook specifically requested by the source sending a flag
-         * that expects there to be a hook on the destination.
-         */
-        if (flags == RAM_CONTROL_HOOK) {
-            qemu_file_set_error(f, -EINVAL);
-        }
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.40.0